Minor deviations from the provisions. Please recommend that the new uses that were not described in the draft eir be eliminated including flexible retail which as noted before us and not permitted in district two. Or, social services, or other services because the public was deprived of the opportunity to even comment on this in the e. I. R. As you can see, from the drawing, he used and the developer site plan the modifications shown the Community Preservation lookalike would achieve the same units while both using a required project open space, Natural Green spaces the public has used for Recreational Purposes and retaining historic list of characteristics. We ask you recommend against all of the items today, send this back and have a community and city Planning Project as this one that has been totally dominated by the developer. Thank you. I did call the novelties, let me call a few more speaker cards. [ name indescernible ] if you line up to my left, youre right. Good afternoon. I
Versus enforceability of what really is underpinning which i completely associate myself with, as a matter of public policy, about whether or not whoever is in that spot, do the community right. Do you end up with a store that does not do the community right, or a vacancy . I am willing to take that bet. Trader joes is willing to live without. Insofar as we are actually changing a piece of formula retail legislation to bring them in. That enticement was here which is precisely why this is on the calendar. I would respectfully, in addition to the change i indicated on page three relatively to the unsupportable finding of a non formula Retail Grocery store being less affordable which i would remove, and i will make a motion to that so it would start with a capital, this one time left on the and tended to support. And then i would agree with the recommendation of the Planning Commission on page five, subsection c, to be eliminated. I would suggest that we keep, on pages six, section e and
If you have an argument in the city where the elites, the rich people they have plenty of housing. Theres no problem. Its the majority of people, the core worker in the city. The not underclass, middle who is not served by affordable housing, or work for affordable housing, or anything like this. When we do Something Like this this is what bothers me. You are taking an and elation of a dozen items that will serve a group of individuals who by this one type of car that is no less six pensive than 30,000, and extend to over 100,000. Which currently, inclusive of every person in the city is far less than 5 , and if anybody wants to come up with the metric to deny my less than 5 , i would love to hear it. In that, so, we are making a big compromise for an elitist group. If this was while charging stations that was going to charge electronic vehicles, from fiat 500 down to chevy volt, two teslas, i have a different opinion. I have a completely different opinion. Then we are serving a broade
The order status to phase one, the sfmta is committed to plant 53 new trees prior to the design phase of this project. Architects identified trees which should be removed. So, we are Walking Around 16th street, looking at things making the street scape project more successful. These are the 75 trees that are on the 16th street phase one. Notice the road trees here are trip ficus. Those are the ones a survey rated as being priority removal. In other words, dangerous to people and property. When they marched through and looked at these trees, the ones i picked removal for the healthy one, these eight or ten ficus trees, ignoring all the rest. Here again we have the district ten map of all of the trees, in the vicinity of six teams a phase one. The ones that are not green are also priority removal, and then these are the subject. Going out a little bigger, this is all of district ten. The ones that are not green are also priority removal. Kudos b. U. F. Go after but the ten healthy trees.
It specifically carves out the ability of the city to pass further types of restrictions with respect to other units, so thats something we can continue to legislate on in the future. Vice president koppel commissioner richards . Commissioner richards thats a great thing, but i dont think we have anything written legislatively that says when you demolish a rent controlled unit that youve got to replace one. Commissioner hillis but weve still got that discretion. Right. And sb 330 requires a replacement unit in that place, and we can back that up or do it a different way. Commissioner richards i thought it had to be law. Thanks. Vice president koppel just a couple comments on my side. These arent addressed to anybody, but if skinners looking for certainty, whos the certainty for . Is this good certainty or bad certainty . And i dont know how these can get so confusing and so crossed over each other. I think that these updates thank you again for the great report. If you can answer every