good evening again, president honda, commissioners. cory teague, planning department staff. just briefly, did get a chance to look over the proposed plans by the permit holder just to see if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. the only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. in this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. the rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. i m available for any questions you may have. mr. teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where we re at now? so i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holder s presentation, the h
good evening again, president honda, commissioners. cory teague, planning department staff. just briefly, did get a chance to look over the proposed plans by the permit holder just to see if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. the only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. in this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. the rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. i m available for any questions you may have. mr. teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where we re at now? so i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holder s presentation, the h
planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. the only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. in this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. the rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. i m available for any questions you may have. mr. teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where we re at now? so i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holder s presentation, the height district here it s a 40 foot height district, but because it s rh-1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front property line or the front set back line, and that can go up to 35 feet, and then, it basically follows grade from there. if it s an uphill or if it s a flat property, it just fol
consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. the only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. in this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. the rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. i m available for any questions you may have. mr. teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where we re at now? so i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holder s presentation, the height district here it s a 40 foot height district, but because it s rh-1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front property line or the front set back line, and that can go up to 35 feet, and then, it basically follows grade from there. if it s an uphill or if it s a fl
so the designation of these excellent view corridors, good view corridors, in this case, that s that designation is taking into account this pole and the wiring that s there already? my understanding, the designation is because of the location of the street and the views that are visible from this particular street. so it s kind of so as it is, including that pole and all the wiring. that s my understanding. okay. thank you. when you talked earlier about the characteristics of a good view street, you mentioned buildings, you mentioned parks. i didn t hear you talk about the farthest views, which i would equate probably to the term open space. sorry. can you repeat in your analysis, in the planning department s analysis, for a permit that comes before you on an excellent view street, you mentioned certain things that the department staff looks for. adjacent buildings, historical structures. and you mentioned parks. i didn t hear you talk much about distant