I know exactly. It tells you exactly the world we are living in. Great show as always my friend, great to see you. Good evening and welcome to ayman, everyone tonight. Weve got Breaking News in the Election Interference Case. The Special Counsel has requested a Protective Order against donald trump. Plus were going to debunk Donald Trumps defense. Were going to break down the antiarguments his legal team and his republican allies are already making. Then, the women at the center of the criminal trial, what to know about judge tanya chutkan, and her surprising history with the ex president. Im Ayman Mohyeldin, lets get started. I read a lot of Breaking News this evening, just moments ago, a string of developments regarding Donald Trumps third and arguably most important indictment. Judge tanya chutkan, whos overseeing this case, just denied at trumps legal team an extension to respond to a Protective Order request from the Special Counsels office. Now, prosecutors filed the request for
Here. And our second guest is the Prime Minister of israel were to meet their imbalance he can explain whats taking place in the state of israel. Their media over there is even worse in our media if you can believe it or not pretty going to want to dig into that. But before we do, ive done a lot of Research Research on a number of issues i want to cover with you my opening statement. But first, theres a lot that is been said about these new indictments brought against President Trump. He is Superseding List of indictments. And i want to get into the socalled Superseding List a little bit later. But that said, what everybody is missing here is President Trump did not delete a single video, how do i know that . I read this indictment. He is charged with trying to get employees to delete videos attempted to delete maralago Security Footage the mishandling of government records. So these records were not deleted. They have all of the video. Over nine months worth of video. So, what they ar
we ll see you here tomorrow night. now it s time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. it turns out all of our guests are of asian descent and expert about what we ve been seeing in atlanta except for one guest, which is, of course, senator john osoff, who will be joining us and also discussing the situation in atlanta and the situation in the united states senate. so, it s excellent. a night of serious reflection on a situation that really now needs our attention. absolutely. get to it, my friend. thank you, lawrence. thank you, rachel. katherine tai was born to parents who were born in china, went to yale, harvard law school, became an expert in trade and she served in the bush administration as general counsel to the united states trade representative, a cabinet level position. general counsel is a very important job. she continued as counsel to the trade representative during the obama administration when the trade representative was an bomb appoint
to steal the election down here in georgia. i think that motion is going to be denied eventually. with what they did though, recently, was asked judge jones, on a bomb appointee, a fairly straight middle of the road in moderate federal judge, a real stickler for the rules, as most federal judges are, they asked the judge to stop fani willis from arresting mark meadows as he litigated the motion to have the case removed. there is no basis in law or statute for that kind of freezing. judge jones quickly told him that. look, there is nothing in the statute that would allow me to stop fani willis from arresting you. we will get to your motion in due time as it is scheduled for next week, but in the meantime you are on your own as it relates to the arrest warrant in fulton county. when i saw that they had filed those motions i asked my wife, who is a law scholar and
that is how the majority of this person to criminal cases across the country. chutkan, and a bomb appointee who his served on the bench for nearly a decade, is not new to generate six federal cases. in fact, she is known for handed out some of the toughest penalties to the capital priorities. one of two doesn t executives who have collectively sentenced more than two dozen defendants for that role in the attack. her colleagues often opposed more lenient punishments than what prosecutors requested. but chutkan has matched or exceeded those recommendations in 19 of her 38 cents. is that much for the only d.c. federal judge what took up beyond what doj lawyers asked for. chutkan has also rolled against trump in the past. she rejected his request to block noting in her ruling, president biden was not obliged to honor trump s claims of executive privilege. she wrote that trump appeared to have the impression, quote,