here. and our second guest is the prime minister of israel were to meet their imbalance he can explain what's taking place in the state of israel. their media over there is even worse in our media if you can believe it or not pretty going to want to dig into that. but before we do, i've done a lot of research research on a number of issues i want to cover with you my opening statement. but first, there's a lot that is been said about these new indictments brought against president trump. he is superseding list of indictments. and i want to get into the so-called superseding list a little bit later. but that said, what everybody is missing here is president trump did not delete a single video, how do i know that? i read this indictment. he is charged with trying to get employees to delete videos attempted to delete mar-a-lago security footage the mishandling of government records. so these records were not deleted. they have all of the video. over nine months worth of video. so, what they are doing here is a piling on that he said, he said they're trying to get somebody to flip one of these individuals a maintenance man an it person. the little people they are going after. because the truth is the rest of the case is very, very vulnerable. this is vulnerable to in my view. it is a very, very vulnerable. i'm going to get into that in a second period before i do i want you to look at this chart and demonstrate to you that when merrick garland said were going to have a special counsel, the purpose of a special counsel is to have a prosecutor that is outside main justice to bring in fresh faces, fresh blood so you do not have a conflict of interest or an appearance of conflict of interest. it is not to set up your own federal government law firm with unlimited resources, 60 prosecutors and investigators to target a former president of the united states. that is exactly what is taking place. jack smith was sent to the hague because he was a lousy overzealous, mail prosecutor who formally headed the public integrity section of the department of justice. and i want to get into this. who is jack smith? chief of the public integrity section from 2010 until 2015. who did he report to ultimately cost him at eric holder you will see eric holder has a lot to do with a lot of the people who are now involved in hunting down donald trump. he served under attorney general eric holder. he oversaw the irs targeting the tea party during the obama administration. he oversaw he failed ultimately prosecutions of governor mcdonnell, senator menendez, senator edwards. he worked with fbi director james comey is head of the public integrity section. he worked with fbi general counsel wiseman who you are quite familiar with this head of the public integrity section for just telling a man who is independent from the department of justice? does telling a man who is independent from the democrat party? he was chosen on the recommendation of lisa monica of the deputy attorney general who had multiple positions, senior positions in the obama department of justice but also primarily under eric holder. her deputy marshal miller worked with submissive for years in the u.s. attorney's office in brooklyn and recommended smith as the story goes sue who in turn recommended smith to american garlands. out of all of the people he could've chosen in america they go to the hague to bring back smith. because he is a hitman. judge barrow was a judge who oversaw all of these motions that were filed by the trump lawyers and the government. she rolled one 100% against donald trump. one 100% for the government. she has since retired but the damage is done. she worked for former democrats editor on the hill patrick leahy for 10 years. that was her claim to fame. she of course was appointed by obama. let's go through several more of these people. we would gentleman by the name of david is typically the chief litigator fort smith he has known him a long time but former special counsel to fbi director james comey i'm trying to show you the incestuous relationship these people coming out of main justice the u.s. attorney's office, mostly democrats, democrat operatives they've known each other for decades. so have for many of the judges they come out of main justice and so forth and so on. this is why republicans do not have a chance when they are caught up in something involving the department of justice, the u.s. attorney attorney's officee district of columbia. they do not have a chance the grand juries are chosen from a population that voted 5% for trump, 93% provided. and the court i will get to in a minute. lopsided democrat. lopsided obama and biden. more about this fellow he is a real nasty bird he served with jack smith and the public integrity section top official there. he prosecuted bob mcdonnell, jon edwards and bob menendez. he was in a florida court room the other week making outrageous arguments in front of judge cannon who i have had second thoughts on might actually think she's now doing a pretty good job as a read all the transcripts and so forth. she is extra doing a pretty good job let's see how it turns out overall. she is not one of the d.c. judges which i will get to in a second period we have jay brett who is jay brecht? jay brett has been the justicea long time. he got a special award from eric holder several years back he is a chief of counterintelligence customs and all the rest of it. he's a former assistant u.s. attorney in washington d.c. he is directly involved in the mar-a-lago search he argued strongly the search warrant for the fbi raid. he is over the top. he knows very few bounds. he was i the same florida courtroom the other week with harbaugh. these are the people wh smith hs brought in. he is accused of stanley woodward who represents the codefendant of extortion he has accused waving a federal judgeship in front of this attorney was trying to become a federal judge in washington d.c. for favorable testimony from a client against donald trump. the fact that this guy shows up in a federal courtroom in florida without that being resolved is unbelievable to me. that is who he is. another hitman. then we have raymond hustler another guy who comes so what jack smith did as he brought all of his guys back. all of the people who have abused along the path. all the people who have abused and targeted individuals and turn them into defendants in the past to spread them all in to these special independent counsel office. all come out of main justice. most come out of the holder regime when he was there. he hired harbaugh. he was involved in the edwards menendez cases as well. who is julie edelstein? she interned for who? representative thompson. okay, who is married dormant? married dormant clerk for berylw howell. how is she on the case with a conflict of interest like that, doesn't matter. so there she is a prosecutor in the case. timothy jewelry, who is he? he is another hunter. he donated to the 2020 biden campaign. what about that, isn't that a serious issue? you would think it would be, right? there is more fo per this is whi found after many, many hours of investigation the funny thing is judicial watch has sued the department of justice and the special counsel's office because they will not release the names of all of the personnel, can you imagine that? we know the people who work for mueller, why? because smith does not want you to know that he has hired hitman, hatchet men, the department of justice's main justimainjustice from the u.s. s office, people who worked with him in public integrity. people with connections to james comey. almost all of whom served under eric holder. people with connections to oba obama. that is essentially the group of individuals who every day are looking for ways to take out donald trump. i want you to know this. every day are looking for ways to take out the people who work for donald trump and of course are trying to do for the election. except that they are as a matter of facfact they are as an affire matter of fact. they are of the same mindset as the prior group that worked so hard to interfere in the last election which was pointed out by u.s. attorney derman. nothing has changed over there and by the way andrew wiseman became head of the enron task force student who appointed him to part of the enron task force when he was assistant attorney y general for the criminal division? christopher wray the current fbi director who chris christie has about four of course. so this whole thing stinks. now let's look at the judges in washington d.c. shall we? the democrats are working very hard, abiding specially to appoint activists, left wing democrat judges in the district court level trial level judgeships. first we had judge how who has since retired. the day she retired she issued a very controversial decision because jack smith wanted to get the information and notes of donald trump's lawyer involved in the documents case. attorney-client privilege exist to protect her due process rights. if you cannot consult your lawyer that's fine it's a crime fraud exception we have no idea how she ruled. we do not have the order we do not know a thing about what she did. but we do know she ha is role to construct every step of the way and ruled for smith and his predecessor every step of the way. she has since retired she was replaced with the chief judge james belzberg who appointed him? obama. he used to work in the u.s. attorney's office in washington to their signature judge, rudolph contrariness, a bomb appointee. he worked in the u.s. attorney's office in washington d.c. at one point. judge christopher cooper obama judge. he worked in the u.s. department of justice in washington d.c. judge tonya and obama judge was in the d.c. public defender's office that is in washington. judge randolph moss he worked at the u.s. department of justice in washington appointed by obama. judge of mensa worked in the d.c. public defender's office, appointed by obama. judge timothy kelly appointed by trump, kelly worked in the u.s. attorney's office. thorton improperly integrity section of the department of justice that is important. there is this relationship, professional relationship, social relationship i almost don't care who appoints you that exists in the swamp. judge trevor mcfadden was in the u.s. attorney's office at main justice also. trump appointee we have judge friedrich was of the u.s. sentencing commission, main justice under bush appointed by trump. we have judge in nichols i do not know much about judge nichols. then we have shia public defender's office in d.c. appointed by biden. judge ana reyes appointed by biden. you have 10 of the 12 judges and the d.c. circuit court who worked at main justice, eight of the 12 or appoint 12 were appoia or biden. the chief judge was appointed by obama for the prior chief judge was appointed by obama. the grand jury is made up of citizens from the district of columbia. 5% of whom voted for donald trump. since why the grand jury was used in washington d.c. you take out trump. this is why all of the original charges were brought by the grand jury in washington d.c. because where they were supposed to go and where this grand jury was supposed to be working and investigating all of these months was in florida. here's the united states department of justice manual with the u.s. attorney. you look at nine -- 11.121. venue limitations. this is required. venue limitations one sentence that case should not be presented to a grand jury in a district unless venue for the offense lies in the district. the documents cases in florida. all of the work was done washington d.c. these lawyers for donald trump need to file a motion that should not wait for the trail they are to file a motion to dismiss it for prosecutorial misconduct and because they change the venue the basis of the venue shopping i would call it. i'm so all of these charges should be thrown out through the rules of the department of justice are one had a percent clear. and grand jurors are supposed to be chosen from the district in which the activities took place. any charges that would be brought in that was clearly violated by they should immediately bring a motion to dismiss the search warrant i talked about this the other week it's a general warrant. it would end the entire case they should have a franks hearing that securing with the judge on the basis for the warrant to be the information i was in that warrant and whether any exculpatory information was concealed from the court so there should be a motion to dismiss for prosecutorial misconduct involving jay brack was in the judge's courtroom in florida for allegedly extorting one of the defendants the attorney for one of the defendants in the case. that is still under secret review by a judge in the district of columbia. this case belongs in florida, all of it. one other point involving this deal that fell through the department of justice and hunter biden i think a lot of people are missing another fact. this judge in wilmington is not part of the social professional swamp of judges and washington d.c. she is in wilmington, delaware she has no connection to those people. an honest judge with integrity was not biased makes a huge difference in this country. that is what happens. the biden lawyers and the department of justice are used to being rubberstamped the department of justice has been rubberstamped all throughout the trump investigation for that is the judges have upheld virtually every single thing they wanted to do including all of the abuses this judge is not part of that circle. she isn't wilmington by the judge in florida, judge cannon is not part of the circle it's with a trash sure they're trying to influence her. she is not part of the circle. so that is what is important to understand the people say how did they expect to get away with this? because they are used to getting away with it. except when you move outside of washington, don't get me wrong the courts are not perfect. when you move outside of washington you actually have a chance at justice and due process. that is what happened in wilmington. let's hope it continues and that's hopefully what will happen in florida. i will be right back. so much more now? other companies are charging you more and more for less and less. and we hate that! that's why force factor has partnered with walmart to provide amazing supplements at great prices for all americans. force factor products use clinically studied patented ingredients to powerfully improve your health. they're also delicious, easy to use and affordable. that's why force factor is now the number one best selling herbs and supplements brand at walmart. rush to walmart and unleash your potential with force factor. anyone will tell you, battling cancer is not pretty. and neither are the complications you may not see coming. like lymphedema - le for short. a chronic disease that can leave anyone undergoing cancer treatment with a lifetime of swelling and pain, often affecting one's entire body and sense of self. if you're facing a cancer diagnosis, discuss lymphedema with your doctor. with knowledge and action, we can learn, and live. every business that's why comcast business de is launching theal. mobile made free event. with our business internet, new and existing customers can get one year of unlimited mobile for free. it's our best internet. powered by the next generation 10g network and with 99.9% reliability. plus one line of free mobile for an entire year. it's the mobile made free event-happening now. get started for just $49.99 a month. plus, ask how to get one free line of unlimited mobile. comcast business, powering possibilities. goli, taste your goals. back america nobody better to discuss jack smith. his people and their abuses. someone who is victimized by them former governor bob mcdonnell republican virginia bread governor welcome to the program. maybe you can walk us through this the public integrity section, david hart about right-hharbaughright-hand man t. he is one of the guys that focused on you. you had to go through this for you are convicted on appeal they uphold it at the supreme court says wait a minute. you cannot define bribery as jack smith and the boys define a bribery. they said in their case john roberts wrote the opinion of the federal bribery statute indicted not just you but your wife. can you tell us about this? ask first thank you for having me on fedex trash was painful three and a half years from the investigation until we got the unanimous vindication by the u.s. supreme court. i knew in my heart from the beginning i'm a lawyer look at the law the facts these charges were completely wrong. at the time david harber was the lead prosecutors in the case he did the closing argument on jack smith during a five year stretch in 2010 until 15. i had two of the best firms in the world, they went to the justice department the deputy determinate of attorney of the . that extensive brief about why they got it wrong and why i didn't do anything wrong. and yet they persisted and pulled the trigger and the indictment started of course they have got all of the investigators they've got all the money. they've got access to the "washington post" and multiple leaks. it took unanimous supreme court to get right. when he did in the lois lerner case. it's okay to go after conservatives and bob menendez. in other cases. i think he is just overzealous. i think he does not look at honest look at the law to see if the facts apply to the law. so he would rather win and get it right. i think it may be that some of the influence we have seen in some of the decisions he's making in the current cases. that's why the supreme court of the united states said look got it completely wrong. it's not ketchup the ordinary things that political figures do and every day in the country put everybody at risk with the review of the law. that is a caution. >> if they try to undermine your attorney-client privilege with your lawyers? >> we had leaks of grand jury information that end up in the "washington post" which is of course completely wrong doing that. there was evidence that came in during the trial tendered by the government that were things i specifically talked about with my own counsel to counsel to the governor. those came in over the strenuous objection and something that should not have been in before a jury that helps the tainted ju jury. in my chief of stance that was a lawyer that should not have come in. >> there is a prior victim. they wiretapped the discussions and use it in the grand jury and so forth. but access. there are so many members of the staff, my family my friends are brought before the grand jury. this is in 2013 i'm trying to government a grand jury. and for some of them the word i got was they were strongly implying to them that if they cooperated in any way and saying favorable things about me they could be charged with obstruction of justice. that's the kind of pressure that were put on people in my administration. i have been a prosecutor been attorney general i am a pro at law enforcement person. we've got the best justice system in the world but it is not perfect. as you point out if you get to the point you'd rather win they get the law it right and undermine the rule of law and a weapon i say criminal justice system uncover its republican or democrat you undermine a central tenet of the american justice system and american society that is dangerous regardless of which party is doing it. >> may return, he also charged your wife they were trying to bring pressure on one or both of you. to testify against each other. tell us about that when we returned and return and how thad your family. we will be right back. ah, these bills are crazy. she has no idea she's sitting on a goldmine. well she doesn't know that if she owns a life insurance policy of $100,000 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com. day 1: the hardest day. the day you hear... i'm sorry...this is a type of blood cancer. but day 1 is just one day. at the leukemia and lymphoma society, we are here to help you move past day 1. on day 45, i discovered an online community. i missed a lot of school during treatment and lls helped me keep up. to learn more and get help on day 2, day 28, or any day... please visit lls.org or call 1.800.955.4572 of lying about moving boxes of classified documents. he's charged with obstruction and making false statements. ashlee strong minded back to life, liberty and live in i'm making false statements. i am jon scott now. back to lif, liberty & levin. welcome back america>> welcome bac too. court it took the supreme court three and a half years later eight -- zero two exonerate governor bob mcdonnell who went through hell and told his family. what did they ditch your wife? lexmark they charge or tissues of volunteer she's not a government employee they charged her with all the same charges and a few more and then of course during the process of the investigation tried to get her to testify against me. on they would drop all the charges and of course there is noththere'snothing she could sar credit, full credit we both said were not going to plead to anything. we will see you in court and they did the same thing with the businessman that was involved gave them to transactional immunity's full immunity tent statements he went from saying there's nothing that happened here to testifying against me. i feel like the leverage they used was highly destructive to me and my family but thank god for redemption and restoration. the other thing that is important is we had 13 amicus briefs in this case. we had the five previous white house counsel from every president, from ronald reagan to barack obama. eighty-three former attorneys general's o of the states they l said the same thing this is wrong, this is destructive it is a bipartisan condemnation of the theory of the government. i think some of that carried and john roberts a unanimous opinion about why this was harmful to the american political system to do what they did. i set up meetings for a donor that's essentially what happened and they criminalized it. >> will be asked of this if you are the attorney general of the united states you can pick from any lawyer you want to be special counsel in a matter that involves a former president whos the leading republican nominee in the republican primary process and we have an ongoing election taking place, is this the man you would select to be the special counsel to conduct the investigation given all the history with you, the supreme court decision, the jury decisions in north carolina and new jersey and all the rest of it, is this the man you would choose? is he the careful, thoughtful individual you investigating somebody like this at a time like this? >> notice starting decision. he is a harvard alarm guy early in his career had a lot of high-profile complicated cases feedback from that did it well. when he got the five years in the public integrity section he took on high-profile cases against people in both the parties, mark. and heat loss of the cases and cases that arguably should never have been brought too. as you note mark, as a lawyer the duty of a government lawyer is very different than any other lawyer. you are supposed to seek suit truth and justice not being to convict. that is where mr. smith may be falling down in his judgment about calling balls and strikes. that is what prosecutors are supposed to do just like judges of the facts and the law do not match up to not bring the case. it seems like he has had a habit of bringing cases in order to win that he should not abroad. >> i listen to you governor and i read these other cases i read the supreme court decision these other juries did, i'm the attorney general i sit there as chief of staff to attorney general and if somebody brought to me, this is the guy that should be special counsel i would've advised the attorney general have they lost their minds? this is one of the last guys should be handling a case like this. do you agree or disagree kuester. >> i agree. this is historic, never has a president of the nine states been indicted let alone tried or convicted he is also the leading candidate for a party. you want to be absolutely beyond reproach. given the train of losses and what i would say abuses of the process in order to win, i think mr. smith despite his early career in his clear academic pedigree was not the right guy because again is a judgment i think is tainted by the desire to prevail. that is not the right formula credentials to try to evaluate charges against the president of the united states because i want to thank you governor. and appreciate you coming on the air. in explaining to the american people some of the background involving your case and a jack smith. good luck to you and god bless you sir projects thank you marketing the rule of law is so important. thank you for hosting the section talking about it, thank you. ♪ i got the eye of the tiger ♪ ♪ a fighter ♪ ♪ dancing through the fire ♪ ♪ the eye of the champion ♪ ♪ and you're gonna hear me roar ♪ ♪ (music) ♪ ♪ roar ♪ ♪ oh ♪ ♪ oh ♪ ♪ roar ♪ ♪ i got the eye of the tiger ♪ ♪ a fighter ♪ back america for we have a special guest it is really an honor to have prime minister benjamin netanyahu on the program but mr. prime minister lelosman said about what is goig on in israel, most of it is wrong. you have a supreme court in israel basically a handful of lawyers who essentially appoint themselves to the court with the help of other lawyers. and since the 1990s they have effectively empowered themselves to have the final say on really all matters israel including changing laws, rewriting laws, taking laws that are passed and rejecting them based on something called the reasonableness standard. our country we do not have something called the reasonableness standard that means these lawyers basically can decide whatever they want to reasonableness means anything and it means nothing. and you are trying and a very modest way to get consensus to address this. can you explain to the american people what you're doing? >> i think you hit the nail on the head. the last 30 years israel has undergone a revolution by the most activist judicial court on the planet. and systematically it itself the powers of the legislature and executive were trying to bring it back in line somewhat to what israel was in the first five decades of utmost democracies are today. so we want to obviously create a system of checks and balances. the reasonableness clause says you don't eliminated altogether but you say that it is not enough to decide to nullify government decision or law based on something subjective like an argument i think this is unreasonable. and so there are limitations on this. this is what you have in all democracies. this is presented by our opponents as a being this awful end to democracy. at that's a case you have no democracy anywhere else on earth. and of course you have to remember the court has a lot of other checks they can disqualify apartments by saying there's conflict of interest or undue process, you name it. you do say you cannot disqualify things simply because you find it unreasonable. i think that is long overdue. this comes after we put forward a much more encompassing reform and we sort of trimmed it down in order to try to reach consensus. three months of negotiations got nowhere with the opposition that is held hostage by extreme minority that organizes all these protests and demonstrations. and so i decided to pass a reasonableness clause. but having done that i am still trying to get a consensus because it is better for it democracy judicial changes are done with a broad consensus as you can. that is basically where we are objectively. it's that what you read, so would you hear us out the news media are covering they are just wrong. >> mr. prime minister your opposition parties have organized most of these protests. they have not been secret about although that media seems to ignore it. we are talked about opposition to uconn not to your majority, your coalition per they've not accepted the results of the election. as i see it they're trying to overthrow your government per their trying to get your government to back off it. by the way that is how the former prime minister who is helped organize this effort in many, many others. if all kinds of dark money seeping into your country even from outside your country. you have all kinds of mouthpiece surrogates like thomas freedman and others who are trying to undermine your government and have never supported your government. is this really a way to try and destroy the destroy the coalition you put together with the overwhelming support of the israeli people? >> you know the organizers of the demonstrations do so openly in fact they began their efforts well before we establish the government or put forward the judicial reform. they state listen this is the center right government. and thethey want a left governm. they do not want us empower they want to be empower except they cannot get it through elections so they are trying to do it through these massive disruptions and blocking roads, setting up the fires, blocking the airport and things of that sort. the other thing they are trying to do is basically i would say assemble a cast of former generals basically telling the government if you do not do what you say if you go ahead with legislation we are going to incite mass disobedience in the army. i will tell you the date that israel's elected governments succumbs to threats by former generals that is the end of democracy and we are not going to let that happen. that is where we are today and we are not letting it happen. >> in america we have a word for that is called treason. we will be right back. the next disaster is coming. the time to get ready is now. make a plan. identify meet-up locations and people you'll need to contact. and keep your contact list somewhere safe. build a kit with enough food and water for three days. and don't forget your pets! keep seven days of medication on hand. work with your pharmacist and insurance company to get the extra doses. make copies of important documents, and keep them on your phone, in the cloud or on a usb stick. stay informed. note area hazards. take courses in cpr and first aid, and sign up for local alerts. be ready. learn more at americares.org/sendusin. back america. prime minister benjamin netanyahu. don't you find it odd all of these other countries trying to interfere in your internal affairs. on behalf of the judicial oligarchy which is antidemocratic. many of these other countries their leaders are trashing their courts and their supreme court's left and right all of the time. do you tell any country like the united states how they should conduct themselves in dealing with their courts? >> no i don't i have been empower elected to six times democratically. it's a total of 16 years and all the 16 years i never commented on the internal debates of other democracies. i have chosen not to do that. nope other leaders and elected leaders can decide to do that everybody has an opinion on israel. they do not have an opinion on the rights of france for the protest or the debates that happen inside other countries you have a major debate between the supreme court and executive rate in america i really don't care to comment about about people choose to comment about hours it's okay. we will make our own decisions in democracies sovereign states, sovereign democracies the elected representatives of the people make the decisions. that's how it's going to be in israel. by the way my criticism is not that they are engaging in treason i don't think that is the issue. it's illegitimate and wrong part what we are doing is not waking the israeli democracy we are strengthening it were bringing back in line to utmost democracies are were israel was in its first five decades. i work should be eaten now in the coming decades. >> that is what i would call the peacemaker with the pacemaker. i'm definitely not the peacemaker and i don't have a pacemaker yet progress y progreo for one of my aids but that's fine. [laughter] well, why not. here is the thing. is it not odd to you that you are the one in your party, your coalition promoting democracy, for the voters for the people of israel. that is called dictatorship. the other side is fighting to defend a judicial oligarchy because let's be honest, but oligarchy goes one way it is hard left. they appoint each other it is incestuous and so forth. because it helps the minority parties in your essay to help the opposition parties i should say in your country, no? >> i think there are political motives very strong political motives. there's also misconceptions wrong concepts what is democracy? democracy balances the will of the majority with the rights the individual rights of the rights of the minorities. how do you achieve that balance? the founding fathers of the united states came up with the only formula that works. that formula means there is a balance of power between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. that is what guarantees the proper balance between the will of the majority in the rights of the minority. that balance has been thrown off the rails in israel as a said the most activist judicial court anywhere on earth. we are trying to restore it. that is said to be an affront to democracy in other words it doesn't make any difference whom you elect to elected the government you voted for this or that policy. you do not decide by the way they are respectable people. they are good i don't have anything bad to say about them as individuals. but they have not been elected they are often self-selected. they will decide instead of the people. obviously we cannot have the other side that the elected legislature old government can do anything they want without judicial review. there is a balance there we are trying to restore the balance. that is said to be the end of democracy and this is just silly. question got your hands full and despite that you're doing a fantastic job for my perspective. i want to thank you again mr. prime minister. best to you and your family. >> thank you, thank you. we will be right back. ♪ ow! whoa! watch where you're going. yeah mom, pay attention. what if it's a concussion? hang on, i'll look it up. uh... i'm probably fine... probably? we noticed something wasn't right and got her to a doctor. i thought i was okay, but i had a concussion. sometimes, it's hard to tell on your own. don't mess with your melon. if you hit it, get it checked. >> welcome back america, as you know soon will be coming out pretty and you can order become a preorder a copy heavily discounted amazon.com or any ree that has a link and everything you look at today, is going wrong in this country, you going back to the number party, could 100 years ago or 150 years ago, the civil war, the ku klux klan, the voting activities taking place by the democrats, until today the marxist agenda and the open borders, and the war on appliances climate change, and the rest. this is the most comprehensive book, ever written on the subject. it is about time that we point the finger where it belongs this is not service-level stuff, is a substantive account with philosophy and history real substance, about the deming into the party is doing to this country, and you can get your puppy preorder down, the number nothing is market and amazon are common or any outlets and i will see you next time on life, liberty >> good evening and thank you for joining us, i'm katie pavlich in for trey gowdy. it is sunday night in america. the judge in hunter biden tax and gun case said she could not accept the plea deal. the president's son sweetheart deal that would have helped hunter avoid jail time derailed after the judge questioned the constitutionality of the agreement. hunter pleaded not guilty as federal pr