Indictment so lame and overtly political that its guarantied to galvanize every trump voter like funnel cake at a stock car race. Theres less meet on this indictment than a you are i can carcass in joy behars trash can. Stelter has a better chance of winning a wet tshirt contest. Dont Bother Reading it i can summit up for you. Donald trump disagreed with the election outcome. Oh, you thought there would be more . Sorry, these are democrats, they dont have to work hard when the media gives them cover and yes there is a second part, to forget about the hunter and joe show. Make news to conceal the real news. Yes, the doj and jack smith apparently believe that trumps Thought Crimes are more insidious than the International Racketeering gang known as the biden clan. Instead they chase Thought Crimes and if Thought Crimes were fromable we would all be screwed. Kat would be on death row complaining about wearing orange. But, see, we dont do Thought Crimes in this country. This isnt canada. T
Indictment so lame and overtly political that its guarantied to galvanize every trump voter like funnel cake at a stock car race. Theres less meet on this indictment than a you are i can carcass in joy behars trash can. Stelter has a better chance of winning a wet tshirt contest. Dont Bother Reading it i can summit up for you. Donald trump disagreed with the election outcome. Oh, you thought there would be more . Sorry, these are democrats, they dont have to work hard when the media gives them cover and yes there is a second part, to forget about the hunter and joe show. Make news to conceal the real news. Yes, the doj and jack smith apparently believe that trumps Thought Crimes are more insidious than the International Racketeering gang known as the biden clan. Instead they chase Thought Crimes and if Thought Crimes were fromable we would all be screwed. Kat would be on death row complaining about wearing orange. But, see, we dont do Thought Crimes in this country. This isnt canada. T
The opportunity to enter a plea. Throughout our special coverage, we will dig deep into this latest indictment. This latest push, claiming the indictment violates his right to free speech. They are suggesting moving it to west virginia. Lets bring in our reporters and our panel. Ken dilanian and garrett haake, outside the Courthouse Blocks from here. Former fbi General Counsel andrew weissmann. Former u. S. Attorney joyce vance. Jen psaki. Take us through what we will see this afternoon. Reporter this is both a surrender and an arraignment. We expect mr. Trump will enter the courthouse through a tunnel. He will be processed, we are told, because he has to be booked for each one of these. He will be fingerprinted through a digital machine. His mugshot wont be taken. They will use an existing photo. He may be asked some questions, including his age. Then at some point he will make his way to the Magistrate Judges courtroom. Shes not the judge presiding over the case. She will hear the ar
have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corru corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, it it says: so he takes a brib bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set f forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, d does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did joc jack the r ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed positively to th
have told you in past, h d two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed