Stay updated with breaking news from Ambassador taylor. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
among those questions, what it could mean for 2020. could some in the president s party be rethinking whether they want to stick with mr. trump amid the impeachment fight. we ll break down all the i m kagss of last night s elections results. a significant new twist in the impeachment inquiry. eu ambassador gordon sondland changing his story now, backing up the testimony of several other key witnesses regarding aid to ukraine and the commitment to investigate the 2016 election and the bidens. but why was he allowed to change his testimony? we re going to dig into that in just a moment. let s go right to the implications of tuesday s elections. for that i want to bring in msnbc national political correspondent steve kornacki. he s at the big board. nbc news road war i don t vaughn hillyard joins us from louisville, kentucky. vaughn, it s a state that president trump won by about 30 points in 2016. here we are just three years later. looks like there will be a deck kr democrat in ....
wt is the full extent cleared away. chuck rosenberg. of the democrats prior senator mccain s former coordination with the whistle-blower, and who else did colleague, jeff flake, retired the whistle-blower coordinate senator from arizona, surmised this effort with? that if a secret impeachment second, what is the full extent vote were held, 30-35 of the of ukraine s election meddling senate republican members would against the trump campaign? vote to impeach. and i thought how sad, how sad, and third, why did burisma hire that it takes a secret vote to hunter biden, and what did he do for them, and did his position make a courageous vote. affect any u.s. government actions under the obama it should be 30-35 if they administration? these questions will remain believe that s the right thing to do. i know i m sounding naive, but i outstanding because republicans were denied the right to call witnesses that know these remember being saddened by that. i feel the same way. answers. ....
to participate and actually defend itself a on the substanc? or was does it do? is it all bombast all the time until we get to potentially an impeachment vote. i want to delve deeper into that point and also tell our viewers here, as we re at the top of the 11:00 hour on the east coast in washington, you re watching msnbc s special live uninterrupted coverage of what all agree is a historic day on capitol hill.c this is the preparation for a house vote on resolution 660, providing for the rules for the potential impeachmentth of the current president donald trump. what you see on your veen is a countdown that will result in proceeding to thatsu vote. so the current count you see on your screen has not yet arrived under the house procedure on the phone. what i can tell you, in a matter of moments when you sigh this count run down,u within the ne nine minutes, we expect the house to, proceed then to the actual vote on the impeachment resolution and trules. we also are told in ....
president, correct? it s appropriate for the justice department and the prosecutor general to cooperate and to exchange information, yes. but to the extent that the president has concerns and to the extent that the attorney general is having u.s. attorney durham look into it, isn t it entirely appropriate for the president to flag this for president zelensky and say that you should be in touch with our official channels? mr. castor, i don t know the precise appropriateness of these kind of relations. now, were you involved, either of you involved with the preparation for the 7/25 call? i was not. i was not. and how do you account for that? i mean, you were the two of the key officials with responsibility for ukrainian policy. if the president of the united states is going to have a call with the leader of the ukraine, why wouldn t you ordinarily be involved with preparation? sir, we work for the department of state in an embassy overseas and in preparation for ....
my ambassador of assistance as well? they did. and if i said that number ambassador sondland s use of was circa in the military that term was that the three assistance around 270 million. would that probably be people three people in accurate? close. charge of the ukrainian about right? yeah. did they get aid in policy. he ambassador volker and secretary perry. what did you come when did you come to learn about fy-18? yes, sir. including security mr. giuliani s role and what do you consider his role to assistance? have been? including security assistance. we have already talked about the javelins, the anti-tank missiles that they i heard about former mayor were not able to purchase in previous administrations. giuliani s interest in ukraine in january of this have they gotten security assistance in fy-19? year. that was a different phase yes, sir. prior to the 400 million than what happened during the summertime. was it normal to have a or so that w ....