Evicted has no place to go. It, its an epidemic when tenant are being evoked and having to sign up for huge long waiting lists. The lees were applying for tenant space and only had one year and were not close to getting a place. The people needing residence are in need we need to keep people in their homes as opposed to trying to help them out after the fact. We need to stop those evictions and curtail them such as probable. As jean noted well be coming forward to the board with new pieces of legislation we think will put a severe dent in the number of evictions. Right now we are fully in support of this legislation. Thank you supervisor chiu and cosponsors next speaker. I want to say i support david choosing legislation. I dont see how a city can function when only 10 percent can afford to live in the city. I wish you a lot of lucky think you will succeed thank you next speaker. speaking foreign language. so im mrs. Lee im here today because you know i was also a victim of ellis evict
Im sort of looking at the items in case anyone has a comment. Mr. Collier if you have any additional thoughts id like to hear them im sorry i dont have the ordinance in front of me but we have the language disabled or ellis act who have lived there 10 years or longer were not removing them because basically, the defines of the disabled is a prosecution against ventilation so the realizing i ellis give us extent tenancy. So but those for the purpose nevertheless, suffer from a disability and need preference so as long as those people get it for 10 years and are indicate tropical ill to get it thats fine but to be disabled to the point you cant work and suffer from lifethreatening illnesses that max makes you indicating trop tropicly ill and nates thats why the time period is shortened to 10 years. I want to make sure people still get the preference just so i understand things clearly all the folks for 10 years for individuals who have been suffering from a lifethreatening illnesses as a
President chiu good afternoon. Welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors meeting of tuesday, november 20, 2012. Madam clerk, call the roll clmpletsd supervisor avalos, present. Supervisor campos, present. President chiu, present. Supervisor chu, present. Supervisor cohen, present. Supervisor elsbernd, present. Supervisor farrell, present. Supervisor kim, present. Supervisor mar, present. Supervisor olague, present. Supervisor wiener, present. Mr. President , all members are present. President chiu thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, could you please join us in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. President chiu colleagues, we have Board Meeting minutes from october 9, 2012. Approve, motion by supervisor mar, seconded by supervisor campos. Those are approved. Are there any communications . Clerk calvillo there are no co
President chiu good afternoon. Welcome to the San Francisco board of supervisors meeting of tuesday, november 20, 2012. Madam clerk, call the roll clmpletsd supervisor avalos, present. Supervisor campos, present. President chiu, present. Supervisor chu, present. Supervisor cohen, present. Supervisor elsbernd, present. Supervisor farrell, present. Supervisor kim, present. Supervisor mar, present. Supervisor olague, present. Supervisor wiener, present. Mr. President , all members are present. President chiu thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, could you please join us in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. President chiu colleagues, we have Board Meeting minutes from october 9, 2012. Approve, motion by supervisor mar, seconded by supervisor campos. Those are approved. Are there any communications . Clerk calvillo there are no co
Working and if we need to make adjustment we can go forward and do that. Let me ask the City Attorney and department is there any thing else you want to add to those comments mr. Chewing im with the Mayors Office housing development. The only item that might be taken up for additional discussion we are that going to clarify the language in the proposed legislation regarding the requirement that tenant can violative if their suffering from a lifethreatening disease they can live in the opt up to 5 years. This is for our office because it seems as if that standard is slightly different from the standard currently administered by the rent board for people disabled from the move in. I understand its a different kind of ellis lawns it looks like their language for someone that is disabled is slightly different. For us its a policy decision whether or not we want to create the same decision. I wanted to bring that to the committees attention to for the protocol if its slightly different for