the outcome. look, i ve beenrt watching the supreme court for 55 years and this has all the hallmarks of reality and itt does not have the hallmark of a decision that sat likely to be changed.ma maybe justice chief justice roberts will go with the minority. but i think they seem to have five votes at this point to overrule roe vs. wade. it was always. let me interrupt you fors a second. let sstith stay with your theory because it s a fascinatinghe one in all the time that you vev been a constitutional professor at harvard, i may add, and you a have taught some of the besto y and brightest people, do you? i ve never i can t think of an instance, not one that a leak like this ever occurred. can you has it never has and itd can only be done if somebody thinks this is an act of civil disobedience, an act which might get him disbarred, fired suom the supreme court or
there havemi been some very famous cases in which powerfulce supreme court justice have beenr the arms of their colleagues on the high court c c and managd to shift completely decisions that went one way and eventually turned the other way. so i d be very cautious and skeptical. i think you re right, sean doesn t seem to me that portion doesn t seem to be written by an eloquent supreme court justice. maybe it s a clerk. yeah,rk professor, i m reallyug curious your thoughts on this because we might actually disagree. i m not sure where youhe stand on roe v. wade whether you think it s good law or a bad law. constitutionalistad conservativs have argued it ss bad law that this is a right not. enumerated in the constitution and that actually is the rolehas of states to go to make their own laws here.own and it wasn t the right of
proceedings. i mean, this is this was a terrible, terrible breach . but the only explanation i can offerr is consistent with the professor that this is someone who is angry or upset atay the way this is moving to eliminate roe vs. wade as the law of the land and has decidedi that they are going ton try to gin up opposition to it publicly in order to put p pressure on supreme courtdon justices. i don t think that would weigh might work with someone like john roberts who may be on the fence here, according toasn politico hasn t yet committed f to which side he ll be on. but as for the other, you know, solid five justices, you know, public pressure will have the opposite effect. ithe will only steel weir resolve to remain
0 naturall constituency, the pictures of the internet. you ll noticee the servants of color in the background had to remain mass . cover your face, sir, if that s seems hypocritical view, what s your science? that s it forence. us tonight.. we ll be back eight pm following every weeknight upsilon and welcome to hannity. all right.we we begin with news just this minuteht nowow and we start with a fox newsew alert now according to a breaking news report from politico, the u.s. supreme court has in fact voted to overturn roe versus wade. if this report turns out to be true, abortion will now be regulated at the state level, meaning it is not going to be illegal probably in most states in the united states they ll be very restrictions. o one of the biggest issues involving this case has to do with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not ex