the outcome. look, i ve beenrt watching the supreme court for 55 years and this has all the hallmarks of reality and itt does not have the hallmark of a decision that sat likely to be changed.ma maybe justice chief justice roberts will go with the minority. but i think they seem to have five votes at this point to overrule roe vs. wade. it was always. let me interrupt you fors a second. let sstith stay with your theory because it s a fascinatinghe one in all the time that you vev been a constitutional professor at harvard, i may add, and you a have taught some of the besto y and brightest people, do you? i ve never i can t think of an instance, not one that a leak like this ever occurred. can you has it never has and itd can only be done if somebody thinks this is an act of civil disobedience, an act which might get him disbarred, fired suom the supreme court or
a state like virginia and some of the states that are much closer calls overall. i think this will have a really net positive effectt on america s capacity not only to have our rightty to privacy o find it the right way, but alsoh protect more children. how do you respond to professor dershowitz, his theory and he said it s only a theory that this was leaked on purposes to to instigate a packing of the court, which we know the left in this country wants to do badly. i think it s a really, really w well thought out theory. i was a student of professor dershowitz a handful of yearseo i wa i learned his feets and we didn t always agree on everything, certainly politically. but it almost certainly seems like this was a decision by someone inside that court toc undermine the integrity of a court with an effort tot substantively change how justices madetoto their decision. i think that willbt fail, but there s no doubt that was likely the intentth the person who leaked this if in fact there
that she has not been waved off the fact that this was a draft from februaryft, which i think f absolutely the case ifta they obtain this draft, it s was a len w one hundred pages. it likely was a legitimate draft. whether that changes, we will know. but i think it s too juicy of a story not to run with . i mean, w how consequential this reporting is, john, if true , never in the history of the supreme court in modern history to have an opinion like this leak h and it makes you wonder how it leaked. was it a clerk and maybe disagreed with the opinion p and took this unprecedented step to put public pressure on justices? they re still making their decisions. i don t know. but someone it would know, but with a motive clearly leak this in a way that is very unusual for the supreme court. alll right.ill be thank you both, shannon bream. we ll be watching you tonight and as always, we ll be watching you tomorrow.y so thank you both for with us. all right.he here with more on the breaking de
within the supreme court no one s going to trust each other and it s just something that is a complete dereliction of duty. whoeveron o did this to greg gerard s point will be disbarred and probably worsep once that person is discoverede if he or she is discovered. sean, governor d, i saw you shaking your head. go ahead. on weigh in on your comment. y i think we need to reminds everybody that the liberals have used the bigig lie. we ve heard that term before apply to conservatives. here s the big lie. the overturning of roe v. wade does not end abortion. that s what they have said.d and it i and it s a big lie.g lie. it simply takes it out of the hands of nine people wearing robes appointed for life and itr puts it in theeo hands of the american people through their elected representatives wherepl it shoud have been all along. some states will have more abortion. ik like my home state won t have any. that s what it will do and it si unfair to say it ends abortion.. i wish it did, but
themselves, don t they ? yeah, they did.g and particularly during the trump era they when they mae the decision that their job as objective reporters was to tu get donald trump and that the american people erred by electing him and he wast a threat to the republic. so to they thought their job was to fix what the american peoplet did instead of t leaving it to i us . you know, i think in this instance, though, sean, i don t put this leak from the supreme court in that category. what really troubles me, not about the ruling itself, if that s the ruling itself, i accept and respect that ruling. but the leaker make no mistake,n, sean, this is an insurrection i againsts the supreme court. i ve already seen people on the left celebrating this leak are calling him brave, trying to throw a hail mary to stop the ruling from being issued. who atat the supreme court willh trust eacher other now if they know that their drafts are going to be leaked just like everything else els in washingt the