there havemi been some very famous cases in which powerfulce supreme court justice have beenr the arms of their colleagues on the high court c c and managd to shift completely decisions that went one way and eventually turned the other way. so i d be very cautious and skeptical. i think you re right, sean doesn t seem to me that portion doesn t seem to be written by an eloquent supreme court justice. maybe it s a clerk. yeah,rk professor, i m reallyug curious your thoughts on this because we might actually disagree. i m not sure where youhe stand on roe v. wade whether you think it s good law or a bad law. constitutionalistad conservativs have argued it ss bad law that this is a right not. enumerated in the constitution and that actually is the rolehas of states to go to make their own laws here.own and it wasn t the right of
0 naturall constituency, the pictures of the internet. you ll noticee the servants of color in the background had to remain mass . cover your face, sir, if that s seems hypocritical view, what s your science? that s it forence. us tonight.. we ll be back eight pm following every weeknight upsilon and welcome to hannity. all right.we we begin with news just this minuteht nowow and we start with a fox newsew alert now according to a breaking news report from politico, the u.s. supreme court has in fact voted to overturn roe versus wade. if this report turns out to be true, abortion will now be regulated at the state level, meaning it is not going to be illegal probably in most states in the united states they ll be very restrictions. o one of the biggest issues involving this case has to do with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not ex