the outcome. look, i ve beenrt watching the supreme court for 55 years and this has all the hallmarks of reality and itt does not have the hallmark of a decision that sat likely to be changed.ma maybe justice chief justice roberts will go with the minority. but i think they seem to have five votes at this point to overrule roe vs. wade. it was always. let me interrupt you fors a second. let sstith stay with your theory because it s a fascinatinghe one in all the time that you vev been a constitutional professor at harvard, i may add, and you a have taught some of the besto y and brightest people, do you? i ve never i can t think of an instance, not one that a leak like this ever occurred. can you has it never has and itd can only be done if somebody thinks this is an act of civil disobedience, an act which might get him disbarred, fired suom the supreme court or
0 naturall constituency, the pictures of the internet. you ll noticee the servants of color in the background had to remain mass . cover your face, sir, if that s seems hypocritical view, what s your science? that s it forence. us tonight.. we ll be back eight pm following every weeknight upsilon and welcome to hannity. all right.we we begin with news just this minuteht nowow and we start with a fox newsew alert now according to a breaking news report from politico, the u.s. supreme court has in fact voted to overturn roe versus wade. if this report turns out to be true, abortion will now be regulated at the state level, meaning it is not going to be illegal probably in most states in the united states they ll be very restrictions. o one of the biggest issues involving this case has to do with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not ex