The low in welcome across the uk were all things are considered im Peter Lavelle us secretary of state mike on kayo is on a mission he claims the world must change china or china will change us how should we interpret this a cold war to be waged against beijing this is also imply or regime change china is certainly a major global competitor but is it now our enemy. To discuss this and more im joined by my guest if you go in beijing he is chair professor and so Chalo University and in stand where we cross to Daniel Wagner he is c. E. O. Of country risk as well as author of china vision the America China to buy and his new book on the belt and wrote initiative in chinese or texas right gentlemen crossed out rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it ok lets go to beijing richard the words that you know the world must change turning over china will change just how do you interpret that because so many commentators and one paul. Was he in the one
Of country risk as well as author of china vision the America China dubai and his new book on the belt and wrote initiative in chinese or texas right gentlemen crossed out rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it ok lets go to beijing richard the words that you know the world must change turning over china will change just how do you interpret that because so many commentators and warm policy in the one hall if you will allow his speech at the Nixon Library a big bewildering because its taking todays circumstances in the post cold war in kind of reverting back to when using the same kind of language and i want to talk about the ideological. I mean china will is changing as. Well 1st of all i see in my poem pale speech at the Richard Nixon president ial library was an insult to those nixon political legacy and its an insult to china u. S. Relations for more than 4 to one yes now talking about change i would say no other country has changed f
Freemarket economics in judeochristian principles. During this session several members of the House Freedom caucus discussed u. S. China relations and how it impacts their districts. Welcome back to the center. We had an actionpacked day. You are about ready to see the best of the best. These are the heroes in congress from Freedom Caucus and the conservative caucus. My good friends up in d. C. Still fighting the fight, that we are still china today and on going to go one by one. We have three panels of four u. S. Congressman so we are honored to have all of you here today, and lets just start off with brian babin from texas, and bryant, im going to leadoff with the other brothers from congress who can do this in the back room, hello, brothers back there, and sisters. I can hear you in the back room. They are all my friends. Con babbitt, want to ask you all kinds of first hurdle is upon which anything else depends is the sense of how did china send us this virus . Was it intentional in
Discuss this and more im joined by my guest beguile in beijing he is chair professor and so Child University and in stand where we cross to Daniel Wagner he is c. E. O. Of country risk as well as author of china vision the America China dubai and his new book on the belt and wrote initiative in chinese or texas right gentlemen crossed up rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it ok lets go to beijing richard the words that you know the world must change turning over china will change just how do you interpret that because so many commentators and one policy or one role if you. Would use the speech at the Nixon Library a big bewildering because its taking todays circumstances in the post cold war in kind of reverting back to when using the same kind of language and i want to talk about the ideological. I mean china will is changing as. Well 1st of all i see in my own quails speech at the Richard Nixon president ial library was an insult to th
Oprah mold to your survival there is nothing philosophical about it as far as i can get its pure chemistry right. Youve summarized it perfectly. However to add one more thing everyone is wired differently because despite the fact that its pure chemistry which turns the chemicals on and off is what ever turn them on and off in your unique individual youth which is just a random collection of experiences so one child in one family might have totally different experiences from another so whatever turn on my dope i mean insert tone and when i was young that gives me a pathway and thats how i seek it in the future but those pathways as far as i understand there are no old sad and stoned theyre pretty strong especially when theyre formed in a. Very young age but its still within the power of an individual to either reshape them or perhaps substitute that. With some other pathways yes exactly and i equated it to learning a Foreign Language in the sense that your old health ways are like your