young. and uh and so it s a it s not exceptional that that young people are doing important things in our military. that s that s really not the issue. the issue is and by the way he had a top secret clearance. the issue is, uh, you know how, uh, you responsibly execute, carry out your duties and how you protect the information. as the pentagon tries to contain this, a secret document not previously reported on shows the chinese military is preparing a supersonic spy drone unit. we have cnn s alex marquardt here with us on on this story. what do we learning about this drone? it s pretty incredible. it is pretty remarkable. it does show significant advancement in china s drone capabilities. and as you noted, this is an assessment that comes from the national geospatial intelligence agency. it was a document was obtained by the washington post, which we ourselves have not seen. verified but what it does indicate is that they have made significant leaps to this drone , which is
fda. i mean, there s just a lot of, um chaos, confusion and unsettled view from doctors, patients. the drug manufacturers here so that uncertainty is not going away. they ll continue to be on edge until at least friday . let s be frank. it s not just chaos and confusion right? it s genuine concern because if the fifth circuit court of appeals ruling goes into effect, if those restrictions or some of those restrictions stand there, not insignificant. i mean, you mentioned the generic manufacturer this this would no longer be approved under this ruling, and that accounts for two thirds of the market right and i imagine there s a financial aspect of that because the generic versions are typically less expensive, perhaps much less expensive, but other things as well window to obtain cristo narrows to seven weeks from 10, the dosages would change. these are significant rules changes if this stands in some form or some of them stand right and one of the things too, that the fda told the supr
having the autocratic stability of the having the autocratic stability of the near abroad of russia guaranteed. his of the near abroad of russia guaranteed. . . of the near abroad of russia guaranteed. his argument is that it is either guaranteed. his argument is that it is either that guaranteed. his argument is that it is either that or - that it is either that or chaos. . , that it is either that or chaos. ., , ., that it is either that or chaos- that it is either that or chaos. ., , ., m chaos. that is what he said. he said there chaos. that is what he said. he said there are chaos. that is what he said. he said there are islamist, - said there are islamist, extremists, to use the word, the terrorist as they say. that is what he said, and that is what he believes. and i think that is fundamentally wrong. because if you build up these autocratic states, they collapsed sooner or later. what is not stable. democracy may not be may be messy but it is stable. the only way
that, looking at post soviet countries and conflicts there, are there some aspects to putin because my policy where he actually acts as a stabilising force, as he has in kazakhstan? i would argue yes. in terms of kazakhstan, i think kazakhstan has been a hideous dictatorship, but, you know, they had chaos, the russians went in, when they went in, the international expert community exploded with commentaries to the effect that russia was an acting almost kazakhstan, and restoring the ussr. a few days later they seem to be on the way out. and nick sing. that annexing. that shows that he is not set on creating a great empire, he is trying to sustain friends and clients in central asia, he is doing it with lukashenko in belarus, he knows his limitations, and the fact
fall, as our questioner has asked? , ., asked? we should humbly say that building asked? we should humbly say that building democracy - asked? we should humbly say that building democracy and i that building democracy and rule that building democracy and rule of that building democracy and rule of law is not that easy. it rule of law is not that easy. it takes rule of law is not that easy. it takes time. culture, tradition, whatever. we have seen tradition, whatever. we have seen that tradition, whatever. we have seen that in those post soviet post seen that in those post soviet post yugoslav states, it is not easy, post yugoslav states, it is not easy, is post yugoslav states, it is not easy, is not straightforward, it requires time, patience, but it requires time, patience, but it is it requires time, patience, but it is worth it requires time, patience, but it is worth it. because the alternative is far worse. the alternative is far worse. the alternative is far