having the autocratic stability of the — having the autocratic stability of the near abroad of russia guaranteed... his of the near abroad of russia guaranteed. . ._ of the near abroad of russia guaranteed... his argument is that it is either _ guaranteed... his argument is that it is either that _ guaranteed... his argument is that it is either that or - that it is either that or chaos. . , that it is either that or chaos. ., , ., that it is either that or chaos-— that it is either that or chaos. ., , ., m chaos. that is what he said. he said there _ chaos. that is what he said. he said there are _ chaos. that is what he said. he said there are islamist, - said there are islamist, extremists, to use the word, the terrorist as they say... that is what he said, and that is what he believes. and i think that is fundamentally wrong. because if you build up these autocratic states, they collapsed sooner or later. what is not stable. democracy may not be —— may be messy but it is stable. the only way to bring long—term stability is to... (crosstalk). that leads into our next question very well, so hold your thoughts there, because we are going to go to a question. my are going to go to a question. my question, so what will happen after the change of all of the other autocratic regimes in post soviet countries? let’s in post soviet countries? let's no to in post soviet countries? let's go to you _ in post soviet countries? let's go to you then. _ in post soviet countries? let's go to you then, olha. -