congress fails to act and the u.s. defaults on its debt will be bad. it s something that looks more possible by the day. the clock is ticking. speaker kevin mccarthy says he wants a deal by this weekend. that it s the only way to give both houses of congress enough time to actually mark up and pass anything on the debt ceiling. but president biden is leaving town tomorrow heading for the g-7 in japan. what punch bowl called a damned if he does, if he doesn t situation for biden with the stakes incredibly high. so with both of those things in mind, the clock and the travel, what is being said inside the white house right now? speaker mccarthy is there meeting with president biden for the third time to avoid a default. look at the background in a second. don t worry. what s on the table and what s even possible. does an acceptable compromise exist? one that actually passes not just the split congress, but this split congress. joining me now, nbc news white house correspondent,
as well as a new video showing the police response to that massacre. a texas house committee investigating this may 24th shooting at robb elementary released a preliminary report on what it has learned so far. saying it found, quote, systemic failures and egregiously poor decision making. those systemic failures including three exterior doors that were unlocked, a classroom door with a faulty lock that nobody dealt with, wi-fi that was not working properly, and a force of nearly 400 law enforcement officers larger than the garrison that defended the alamo that did not have clear leadership, basic communication, significant urgency to take down this gunman. uvalde s mayor responding to the report by putting the city s acting police chief on administrative leave and releasing body cam footage showing the horror in the hallways and outside the school as well. i want to warn you, some of these images you re about to see, they are incredibly disturbing. [ gunshots ] am i green,
a couple of holdouts initially, and they are now of one of cord. shannon: do you think maybe they were convinced, whatever the disagreement was, if there was a disagreement, they asked for the pecker testimony and the cohen testimony, the rereading of the jury instructions, do you think the fact that we didn t hear from them again after that, that that one section or that one conflict was what they needed to get to something now? i think the jury instruction was pretty pro-prosecution. i think a lot of the evidentiary rulings were pro-prosecution. so what you are going to get with a verdict is pretty much what you ve gotten up to that point. what are the rulings? what evidence has come in? what evidence has been excluded? so the expert they never heard from. the jury is only as good as the information they are getting. shannon: well, so that gets to my question, you all having and you have handled some very high-profile cases. is there a situation when afterwards juro
putting the terrorist threat in the border crisis front and center, a fox source confirming an nbc report that more than 400 migrants entered the u.s. through analysis linked smuggling group including at least 50 whose whereabouts remain unknown at this hour. security secondary alejandro mayorkas visiting the border today calling the report and accurate, saying, we have not identified 400 people with exercise. . switch to our cbs report that it meant a printed form from tajikistan may have been plotting a possible terror attack on the homeland. so it s all raising lots of questions and it all comes one day before president biden and donald trump square off at that cn and presidential debate and we are on top of all of it. welcome everyone, i m chandler smith in for neil cavuto, and this is your world. coming up we ll be talking to the house foreign affairs chairman michael mccaul. personal to matt payne in tucson, arizona where secretary mayorkas spoke as a short time a
That it indicated to you that he had been prepped for the call, to expect this issue to come up. What led you to that conclusion . It seemed unlikely that he would be familiar with a Single Company in the context of a call that had that was on the broader bilateral relationship, and it seemed to me that he was either tracking this issue because it was in the press or he was otherwise prepped. Mr. Goldman. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Good morning to both of you. Good morning. On july 25th at approximately 9 00 a. M. You both were sitting in the situation room, probably not too much further away than you are right now, and you were preparing for a longawaited phone call between President Trump and president zelensky. Now, Colonel Vindman, in advance
of this phone call, did you prepare Talking Points as you did for the april 21st call . Yes, i did. What were those Talking Points based upon . They were so this is not in the Public Record and i cant comment to deeply, but what is the areas tha