know there is only one winner. my goodness. does she want to share the title with hillary? no, terrible idea. some people said this is a publicity stunt to get attention for the pageant that lost a lot of carriage on networks when donald trump sold it. what do you say? i agree with brian. they would have to pay steve harvey and miss colombia a lot of money to stage this but this was the best thing ever to happen to the miss universe pageant. before this happened, people forgot it was on. the audience was down a million. now it s headline news all over the country. publicity bonanza. it s they couldn t have they asked for better publicity. video emerged this morning from behind the scenes that shows harvey blaming the tell prompter. here he is. so obviously there blaming the tell prompter but now saying
the baltimore jury pool. and every single one of those jurors was aware of the facts in this case as it was reported. and every single one of those jurors was subject to the curfew and forced by the mayor following the baltimore riots. it s very hard to find a jury pool who would have no information on this case. however, moving it outside of baltimore would likely not have alleviated or cured that particular knowledge because this is a case, kate, as you know, that everybody in the country is watching. it s such a grasping and thought-provoking case to figure out what s going to happen and how will it be dealt with? it s like they couldn t have found an impartial jury who had any less knowledge they did anywhere across the country. and to put an even finer point on it every day that they ve been in there, those in the courtroom have said that you could hear the protests outside the courtroom from inside. so the jury not only, these jurors, they not only, as you
place, but the decision they made here at some point to stick together in all of this given what you know about them, their mind-sets mind-sets, the minds of criminals. is it surprising they stuck together and didn t turn on each other, didn t separate? you know the whole thing one of the problems we have when we re on the outside of any investigation is we just don t know enough about them nor do we know enough about the layout of the land there. so, we can t look through their eyes because we re not standing there going, you know gosh i guess they couldn t have grabbed a car right here because there isn t anything for ten miles, because we just don t know. usually when you do is you go back and look at history. i m sure that the police and investigators did look at this their history, what kind of people were they how did they think, you know what was their relationship. we re talk being two psychopaths, so you know they can turn on each other in three seconds flat if they re not
but the jury didn t believe michelle s death was an accident, and luke hasler was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. his version of what happened almost seemed plausible until the evidence showed it was all a lie. a lot of people are either killed or seriously injured in car accidents, so there s a lot of data about what type of injuries those cause. those were nowhere like michelle s injuries. so the medical examiner s report was critical to say, no, this was not a car accident. we knew they had him, but without evidence, they couldn t have put him away, they couldn t have found him guilty. a lot of what forensics does is to corroborate or disprove stories. we answer questions by looking at physical evidence, and we re able to say that story fits or that story doesn t fit with what
be detected on her body. but the jury didn t believe michelle s death was an accident, and luke hasler was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. his version of what happened almost seemed plausible until the evidence showed it was all a lie. a lot of people are either killed or seriously injured in car accidents, so there s a lot of data about what type of injuries those cause. those were nowhere like michelle s injuries. so the medical examiner s report was critical to say, no, this was not a car accident. we knew they had him, but without evidence, they couldn t have put him away, they couldn t have found him guilty. a lot of what forensics does is to corroborate or disprove stories. we answer questions by looking at physical evidence, and we re able to say that story fits or that story doesn t fit with what we re seeing here.