eight o clock or whatever . it won t matter. big so i think that s the bigeat to challenge. your panel s, great to see all f you. thank you.s thank for the indictment itself. the it itselfis is boilerplan it doesn t allege any federal crime, any state crime that sse been violated. it doesn t allege what the fals e statement is . a state prosecutora fede is prosecuting federal election law violation. that doesn t exist according to federal election law officials. e w officials. it s as simple as it s as simple as that. right now to campaign this point is right. the fec decided not to pursuee a complaint against trump for cog campaign finance rules. so why is alvin bragg joining me now? vimpaign finis a man who undersn brad smith, former commissioner and chairman of the federal election commission. brad , a lot of people hear the acronym fec and their eyes tot you re reallylaze in the spotlight with this this case going on and you said this is all based on a misunderstanding of fed
ce or jeback with me now, the ll eagles, david shewn, former trum schoen p impeachment lawyee and sol wisenberg, former assistant us attorney and deputy independent counsel. david , as we saputy indw with six , the standard for incitement to violence is very fungible in the eyes ofange rothe left. us prece so how dangerous a precedentg oe would a gag order be , a caselie like this where so much is on o the line, only the future of y the country given the twenty, twenty four stakes? yeah,ea a gag order i think k would be completely against the public interest in new york . l law is not terrible. his, gbackon this. cas you go back to nineteen eighty eight . there s a case, new york times co. versu sdge rothwell s, which the judge tried to gag the lawyers in the case and. to be and the court very clearly suppd said that any such order would have to be supportedd , detailed findings and cannot be overbroad. we have to use the least restrictive means and only curtail speech. that s