case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
records and another crime, but is not to say what those crimes were. we are assuming perhaps that they might be election related. i m wondering if you cang if let my what laws were broken. so let me let me say as an initial matter that the indictment doesn t specify that because the law does not speae saw the law does not require me to do that. is that an adequate responseison given the defendant herese? e re it isn t an adequate response. and , atere wiointed outsp a minimum,ll there will be a bil of particulars. so he will havto e to do thatprc before too long as a duees process matter. and i diand i did see i did wats whole press conference and i pai thought the whole press conference was pathetic. c. been saand i ve been saying a few days now, don t focus on the number of counts, focusea on whether or not there s anyg h real substance there. is this something that