case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
assistant us attorney and deputy independent counselww . david , i llh start with you.o i don t even know wherethis w to begin tonight. this whole thing is such a disgrace. ho ibut this indictment, as you read it all 16 pages,, represens represents what it s shocking. i cannot believe that thisttorn district attorney did thisformer to the country to indict a former president based on this kind of theory. i also read the 12 page statement of facts that accompanies the indictment,e and it only raises more questions. the indictment clearly is deficient from a due processr perspective. mr. briggs said , well, they ll producocese evidence at trial.sl this is all they have to do is track the language of the statute. the absolutely not true.. the fifth and sixth amendments require, as a matter of duet they process, right to counsel, etexl cetera, that they be toly d wha exactly they re charged with . the target crime here is absentd from every count o yf the indictment. and you read the state