what s happening here is weaponization of it no one has seen before ever. mother teresa could not beat these charges. jesse: the trump verdict. could be any second. i take full responsibility for my actions. i was disgusting then when i did it and i m disgusted now, i m so sorry. jesse: the pd grand jury is here. on memorial day i proudly stood with a black man. jesse: biden fights the black exodus with elmo. can you fathom that? jesse: plus. i m a man, i m a man! [ ] [ ] jesse: the trial for a crime democrats can t name is now in the hands of a liberal manhattan jury. how does trump think this whole thing is going? mother teresa could not beat these charges. these charges are rigged, the whole thing is rigged. you have a trial like this where the judge is so conflicted he can t breathe, he s going to do his job. it s a disgrace. mother teresa could not beat these charges. jesse: this jury has already deliberated longer than the oj jury but biden mus
hello everyone, i mwith dana perino along with judge jeanine pirro,, kevin o leary, jesse watters and greg gutfeld. this is the five .. [ ] dana: we are awaiting the remarks from donald trump as his fate hangs in the balance. the first day of jury deliberations in the hush money trial is over after four long hours of talking about the case. the jury will be back in court in 9:30 am tomorrow.m. t there is no verdict yet. there are 12 members of theju jury, seven men and five womeno getting their first chance tot discuss amongst themselves six weeks of evidence and testimony. and we ve got the first insighti into how they are feeling. the jurors sending two notes to the judge requesting four piecen of testimony from david peckerth and michael cohen be read aloud. they also asked for the judge tn reread the jury instructionshe that were given earlier today.e and earlier donald trump going off on the trial got comparing himself to one of the biggest religious figures in histo
with judge jeanine pirro, kevin o leary, jesse watters, and greg gutfeld. it s 5:00 in new york city and this is the five. we are awaiting new remarks from donald trump, as his fate hangs in the balance. the first day of jury deliberations in the hush money trial is over come after four long hours of talking about the case. the jury will be back in court at 9:30 a.m. tomorrow. there is no verdict yet. there are 12 members of the jury, seven men and five women getting their first chance to discuss amongst themselves six weeks of evidence and testimony. we ve got the first insights into how they are feeling. the jurors sending two notes to the judge: requesting four pieces of testimony from david packer and michael cohen being read aloud. they also asked for the judge to reread the jury instructions that were given earlier today,, and earlier, donald trump going off on the trial and comparing himself to one of the most famous religious figures in history. this judge i
election day, november, and january 6th, 2021. what would the charge be for this six-week period of raising $200 million what would the legal charge be the legal charge would be mail and wire fraud. if you deprive people of money and property through the use of through false pretenses, through the mails or the wires, and here, obviously, they used email which is the wires and it is interstate commerce, that s illegal under 18 usc 1341 and 1343, the mail and wire fraud statutes those cases are prosecuted all the time i mean, the steve bannon case was an example, the one that was dropped of trump s pardon of steve bannon that s exactly what they said, send us this money and we ll build a wall. they didn t build a wall they were just using it to line
of what may be occurring right now. this is a civil fraud case in connectto trump organization finances it is very detailed and scheduled for trial in the fall. as you noted, andrea, the former president took the fifth amendment many times so what she has to prove her case is not just the underlying evidence but also essentially an adverse inference when you take the fifth amendment in a civil case if, as reported, donald trump is now testifying, what he may be doing is weakening her case. it s harder to get a judge to agree there should be that adverse inference if he is now answering questions. he sees her complaint. when he did this before, he didn t have exactly what she was alleging he has something to shoot at when he is testifying today. of course, there are perils.