will include, quote, evidence of pardons. according to jamie raskin the panel is sorting through a deluge of new evidence and it s enough to postpone next week s hearings until next month. some of that evidence comes from a tip line and some of it from a british made documentary featuring ivanka trump who told a crew in mid-december 2020 that donald trump should continue to fight until every legal remedy is exhausted because, she said, people were questioning the sanctity of our elections. now, that sounds a little bit different from what she said in testimony revealed this month. in april this year ivanka said she believed attorney general bill barr s clonclusion that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud. how did that affect your perspective of the election when attorney general barr made that statement? it affected my perspective. i respect attorney general barr, so i accepted what he was saying. barr made his view public on december 1, 2020. a few days
some of that evidence comes from a tip line and some of it from a british made documentary featuring ivanka trump who told a crew in mid-december 2020 that donald trump should continue to fight until every legal remedy is exhausted because, she said, people were questioning the sanctity of our elections. now, that sounds a little bit different from what she said in testimony revealed this month. in april this year ivanka said she believed attorney general bill barr s conclusion that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud. how did that affect your perspective of the election when attorney general barr made that statement? it affected my perspective. i respect attorney general barr, so i accepted what he was saying. barr made his view public on december 1, 2020. a few days before ivanka spoke to the documentary crew. we should mention that the documentary by british filmmaker alex holder is now owned by discovery plus, a division of cnn s parent company, warne
we were talking before about he s vulnerable in fundamentalen county. it s the same crime as the federal elections. i don t understand, and maybe, counselor, you can tell me why about there s any question about whether you can prosecute this guy for a crime. it s a darn good question. i think his biggest liability if i were donald trump i d be worried for another reason. one a grand jury panel. number two, they ve a solicitation statute. so if you solicit someone to interfere in an election in georgia, that s a crime. so it doesn t just have to be you personally. if you ask someone else to do it on your behalf, which also happened, that too is a crime. right and there s a hook. all this testimony we see through the january 6th panel and continue to see they re going to use that information to
threatening raffensperger. he was shaking him down. we were talking before about he s vulnerable in fulton county. it s the same crime as the federal elections. i don t understand, and maybe, counselor, you can tell me why about there s any question about whether you can prosecute this guy for a crime. it s a darn good question. i think his biggest liability if i were donald trump i d be worried for another reason. one a grand jury panel. number two, they ve a solicitation statute. so if you solicit someone to interfere in an election in georgia, that s a crime. so it doesn t just have to be you personally. if you ask someone else to do it on your behalf, which also happened, that too is a crime. right and there s a hook. all this testimony we see through the january 6th panel
and now is it the solicitation statute. doesn t it have to fit some kind of law that the american people will understand? it has to be understandable to the american people because impeachment and conviction of political acts conducted by the two houses, but they re not locked in to defining a crime consistent with what s already been passed in the united states code or some criminal statute that exists, right. they can define it differently, they can articulate it differently. s they w that s why when peope talk about obstruction of congress, that s in an effort to obstruct impeachment inquiry, which is different. so you re in a different the right way to think about this, in my opinion, is you ve got to think about it in terms of the constitution itself and not be wrapped around any particular statute. this is just the indictment