Advocacy groups who spoke before the house Judiciary Committee. Theyll talk about ways to improve Police Relations within the community and increase accountability among Law Enforcement. This is three hours and 40 minutes. House committee on the judiciary will come to order. The chair is authorized to declare recesses at any time. Welcome to the oversight hearing on Police Practices. Before we begin, i want to briefly recognize susan jensen whose last day on the committee after more than 20 years of service is tomorrow. Susan is highly respected on both sides of the aisle, as one of the preeminent experts on bankruptly, Administrative Law and the federal court system. It is a testament to her knowledge and fairness she worked as a senior counsel for republican and democratic chairs of this committee. First hired by former chair henry hyde for her expertise in bankruptcy law, susan moved to the democratic staff under john conyers, where she expanded her port follow to include Administra
Along with public trust. The House Committee on the judiciary will come to order. Without objection, the judge is authorized to declare recesses at any time. We welcome everyone to the oversight hearing on Police Practices. Before we begin, i want to briefly recognize susan jensen whose last day on the committee after 20 mores of service is tomorrow. Susan is highly respected on both sides of the aisle, is one of the preeminent experts on bankruptcy Administrative Law and the federal court system. It is a testament to her knowledge and fairness that she worked as counsel and later senior counsel for both republican and democratic chairs of this committee. First hired by former chair henry hyde for her expertise in bankruptcy law, susan later moved to the democratic staff under former chair and Ranking Member john conners where she expanded her portfolio to include Administrative Law and ethics issues. When i was elected to serve as chair, i also asked susan to serve as the community pa
I have the couple of things to go over before we get started. Rerecording the event this evening and the cspan is here no interruptions would be excellent. The author will speak first then we will open to questions we do have a microphone over here. Please use that as we can hear you and at the end please full up your chairs before you get into the signing line. I am happy to welcome Richard Harris and his book rigor mortis. Some cost of dollar amounts in human value he chose the science of the Top Research Institutions are in urgent need of repair form from drugs to would be advanced due to failure or dramatic testing errors sloppy science could be potentially fatal. The cofounder says signs of the best way to build the knowledge but mr. Harris reminds us is also humans subject to the publish or perish reverse incentives. Adding to these tensions is a gripping tale of what some call a crisis. Read this book 81 to see how Biomedical Research is reviving itself. Reporting for the npr de
This event should get under way shortly. Nuclear experts will discuss the u. S. And Chinas Nuclear weapons policy. Theyll address how to promote dialogue and understanding. While we wait for this event to get under way, heres whats happening tonight on the cspan networks. Republican president ial candidate donald trump continues on the campaign trail. Today, even though hes now the only republican running for the nomination, the new york businessman is going to be in west virginia, which holds its primary on tuesday. Hell address supporters at a rally in charleston and cspan will have live coverage at 7 00 eastern. Tonight on American History tv primetime, a look at Church Committee. It was set up after watergate to look at possible intelligence gathering by the cia and fbi that led to the creation of todays intelligence committees in the house and senate. It begins at 8 00 eastern. Right now, waiting for the discussion on how to promote dialogue and understanding between the u. S. And
Deterrence and Nuclear Balance. According to the u. S. Perspective, Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Balance are distinct. We can tell the difference between the two ideas, two actions. Deterrence is to maintain the status quo. The definitions work very well for isolated big conflict, if a conflict is isolated and big, then we can, you know, indeed tell the difference between deterrence and compelence. But, you know, if big conflicts, you know, come from escalation, that is always the case, you know, big conflict come from, you know, small conflicts, small conflicts, you know, may escalate to big conflict. So, in that case it may not be easy to tell the difference between deterrence and compelence. The reason is that it is very difficult to figure out who changed the status quo first. Then, you know, if you want an example, you know, you launch a conventional aggression and then you use your Nuclear Weapons to deter the conventional responses from your enemy. So in this case there are tw