Lost the election, and the election wasnt stolen through fraud. Theyre going to have to prove that beyond reasonable doubt. Which is a high bar, of course. A high bar. That leads me to believe that we are seeing the tip of the iceberg on this. Do you think jackson of has more . Yes. I would believe he has a lot more. Okay, lets bring in Michael Cohen, Donald Trumps former fixer, and attory. He is now a principle of crisis x. He is the host of the mea culpa, and political beatdown podcast, and the author of the New York Times bestseller revenge how donald trump weaponized the u. S. Department of justice against his critics. Great to have you tonight. Good to be with. You heard the former Attorney General say that he believes that donald trump knew that he lost the election, and what do you think about that being a defense, that his attorneys are going to say . He believes there are Election Fraud dont nobody could show evidence of it. Donald will now reach to any defense he thinks will
that at least i have an opportunity to provide information, if they haven t already. i m a firm believer rudy giuliani has already spoken. what makes you think that? i understand rudy. rudy has no interest in spending his remaining days on this planet behind bars for donald trump. in fact, i think the more important thing in this indictment to look at, are not to the six coconspirators are, but rather who is missing from this indictment. for example, you don t see any mention of mark meadows. you see nothing of jared kushner. jared kushner was the secretary of everything. how is it possible that he is not listed here? he was there, on donald slap, the entire time, from the day donald entered the white house to the day that he left. how do you explain it? i believe he is probably a cooperating witness. jared kushner, that s
interesting because people pointed out mark meadows is conspicuously absent, okay, from the indictment. jared kushner is his son-in-law. you think his son in law would cooperate against donald trump? in a heartbeat. needing jared is any different than donald? do you think donald wouldn t throw jared under the bus in order to save himself? the answer is an impact to guess. you think the same is true of mark meadows? absolutely. what s the one thing bill barr said i totally agree with? donald doesn t care about anyone or anything other than himself. he is a one-way street. if that means jared has to go down to mark meadows, or rudy, where eastman, or any of them, he doesn t care. that is who he is. speaking of eastman, his attorney says that john eastman will not turn on donald trump. here is what he said earlier tonight. dr. eastman is happy to find his side of the story, to talk about the issues he thinks are
made. whatever this guy says, it is a relevant. they are all, right now, again, in the honeymoon stage where they are not feeling the full force of what jack smith is going to bring on to them. look, i ve been there. i m told the southern district of new york 48 hours to plead guilty, or they re filing 80-page indictment that s going to include my wife. that is on my case. imagine what jack smith and the doj is going to do knowing that they have the information, knowing they have the testimony, we have the documentary evidence, and so on, in order to bring all of these people to justice. quickly, donald trump s, one of his defenses seems to be, i was listening to the advice of my counsel. they are the people telling me to pursue all of these fraudulent election claims. what do you think of that defense? it is exactly why rudy, eastman, clark, sydney powell, all of them need to come clean, and all of them need to provide testimony.
hill, these individuals, many of the people who served him and government that got sucked into those things, and he leaves all this carnage in his wake. do you think he cares about that? he doesn t care about that. loyalty is a one-way street for him. i feel you have something to say about that phenomenon. i agree with everything he said except for the fact that he was part of the group that was leaving the carnage in the street. he was part of the people who are weaponizing the department of justice. he is not an innocent baby in this case. he is, in fact, the guilty party. again, he needs to come clean. as we i mean, in the detriment, it says there are six unindicted coconspirators, and we have a graphic of who we know, where we have reported on, who we eve they are, and there s a sixth who we have not yet confirmed that it. as you know those folks, rudy uliani, what do you think is in store for the six unindicted