Theres most confidence about this product and program. I see. Second part in terms of community hours, im new to this, but i heard a lot about it, did some research. Ive been going to committee events, our constituents in chinatown, especially those that live in single room occupancy, its really hard to reach out to them through internet or by mailing maybe. A lot of contra specific education on this population to help them understand what is going on and what are their choices and what department do you have to reach out to these kind of communities . Yes, good question. Weve gone out and made dozens of presentations already to explain the program at Neighborhood Association meetings mostly around the cities. There is one tonight, in fact. We do have chinese speakers, spanish speakers, people who have some connections in specific communities and were hoping to do better when were working with the department of the environment in a more sort of deliberative and targeted structured cust
Pursuant to section 702 of the foreign Intelligence Surveillance act. Section 702 permits the attorney general to join the authorize surveillance of targeted persons who are not u. S. Persons who are recently believed to be outside of the United States with compelled assistance of Electronic Communication Service providers in order to obtain foreign intelligence information. Although u. S. Worsens may not be targeted under section 702, communications of or concerning u. S. Persons may be acquired. 702 program is extremely complex. It involves multiple agencies, collecting multiple types of information for multiple purposes. Overall, the board has found the information the program collects has been valuable and ineffective in protecting the National Security. The program is operated under a statute that was publicly debated and the text of the statute outlines the basic structure of the program. The operation of the section 702 program has been subject to judicial oversight and extensiv
Program close to the line of constitutional reasonableness. Including the scope of u. S. Versus communications, the use of medications acquired through the internet that are neither to or from the target of the surveillance, and the use of such queries to search information collected under the program for the medications of certain u. S. Persons. With these concerns in mind, the report that we are voting on today offers a set of policy proposals that should strike a better balance between privacy and Civil Liberties and National Security. Push theesigned to program more comfortably into the sphere of reasonableness ensuring that the Program Remains tight to its constitutionally legitimate core. The key goal of our studies to improve public understanding of how the program operates. Therefore we look forward to discussing our proposal, and i want to start by dispelling a great snow should about the programs operation. First, it is audible Collection Program. The program only targets med
Article was not to diminish the night life on the polk street corridor. We feel like the vibrantcy is important to the residents and obviously to the existing businesses that are already there and we want to make sure that we are protected and like i said we are very open to working with the Planning Department and exploring what an appropriate density control alternative would be. And looking at whether that is 100, or 200 square feet and what that would mean for the neighborhood. Okay. Any other commissioner comments before we open it up to Public Comment . Okay, lets have Public Comment on item number 6. Is there anybody who would like to make Public Comment . On this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners . I also think that the proximity limit is going to be just as useful as the total ban. I sympathize in terms of, we need to, you know, think about daytime use, and that balance, and if there is an overwhelming amount of nighttime businesses only. We do need t
Operationalize what had been a longstanding problem for the program and that is, that the city puts up a matching amount of money for the surty to back it with a letter of credit with a bank agreement. And as part of the project, the individual project bidding, the contractors sometimes could not take advantage of the program, because the project was already at capacity. They did not have the money to put aside for the actual backing the citys piece of doing the program. And so, we worked with the hrc, the Controllers Office and the City Attorneys Office and we came up with a solution to create a selfinsurance fund and we did that primarily to take away the other barrier of the projects that were in the late stage and did not have much money for the contractors to take advantage of the program. So that has been in place since 2008 and also increased the letter of Credit Facility agreement to 5 million to provide more program capacity, which seemed to be working very well. So the progra