We are honored to have as the moderator for the panel probably the most qualified and knowledgeable person possible, founder and leader of the cybersecurity practice. And a reminder for those that are just joining the panel, joining the session now, ask questions in your browser. Please take it away. Having him muted myself, thank you for that introduction. Whether or not there is a consensus on your comment about me it certainly sounds like there is a consensus about the desirability at aspen so maybe we do that before too long and looked to getting together. Our panel is in fact the most distinguished and knowledgeable panel that we could provide to discuss the subject on the privacy regulations and very timely. One of the problems with giving talks and making remarks and addressing International Privacy developments is you can prepare the remarks three or four weeks earlier you would have to do it all again. Its a Constant Development and here we are going to be talking on the union
Into the next panel, we are honored to have the moderator for this panel, the most qualified and knowledgeable as possible, founder and leader of highly ranked security practices and a reminder for those just joining the panel, questions in your browser, go to sli. Io, aspen 2020 and ask your question. Take it away. Okay. I will thank scott for that much too generous introduction. Appreciate it. Whether there is a consensus, the desirability of years together in aspen before too long and look forward to getting together in person. Our panel is in fact the most distinguished and knowledgeable panel the we could provide to discuss the subject of International Privacy regulation or dataflows and a problem giving talks making remarks and addressing International Privacy development and dataflows, if you prepared the mom marks 3 or 4 weeks earlier, a constant flow of development to some extent on the court of justice and the European Union in july. The rebuttal, responding to the decision,
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for coming. Well get started with our hearing. I want to thank mr. Comey, james comey, the former director of the fbi for appearing today before the committee to talk with us about cross fire hurricane and anything else the committee would like to speak with him about. So give a little brief introduction of why were here and what were trying to accomplish. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is a tool thats been around for a very long time. For our Intelligence Community, the fbi to make sure that when Foreign Agents, terrorists or agents of a Foreign Government are in our country, they can be surveilled if theyre doing things that are threatening to our National Security. I think this legislation goes all the way back to the 70s. And its been used a lot. Its been used in terrorist cases when we suspect someone of being a terrorist under the foreign intelligence act. We have the Legal Authority to surveil those people. And you can get a warrant u
Thank you. Appreciate the break. Mr. Comey, are you with us . Yes, sir. Okay. Thank you very much. Was that a sufficient break for you . Youre okay . Yes, okay, thank you very much. Was that a sufficient break for you . Youre okay . Yes, thanks very much. Thank you very much. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Mr. Comey, weve heard a number of things this morning, weve heard you say a number of times that the oig found problems in fisa applications across the board, but of course, it was only this one, these involving carter page, that you signed off on, that drew an unprecedented rebuke from the court, which im sure you remember. Let me quote from the order. The frequency of the orders in a case of the sensitive area, have called into question the reliability of the information in other applications. Do you remember that order from the court . It came after i left as i recall, but i remember reading about it. Yes. Have you ever known the court to ever issue the order youre familiar with . Yes.
Please take it away. Having him muted myself, thank you for that introduction. Whether or not there is a consensus on your comment about me it certainly sounds like there is a consensus about the desirability at aspen so maybe we do that before too long and looked to getting together. Our panel is in fact the most distinguished and knowledgeable panel that we could provide to discuss the subject on the privacy regulations and very timely. One of the problems with giving talks and making remarks and addressing International Privacy developments is you can prepare the remarks three or four weeks earlier you would have to do it all again. Its a Constant Development and here we are going to be talking on the union back in july and the kind of counterpoint of the rebuttal responding to the decision, the doj, the department of commerce and we are now honored and pleased to report theres also the Privacy International decision that we expect will be addressing the court of justice this last w