there are new questions tonight about the source of substantial loans the congressman george santos s campaign. the embattled republican, who s been caught in a web of lies as you know, previously claimed he made personal loans to his campaign, totaling more than $700,000. a new filings with the election commission, he is indicating that loans of $500,000 and $125,000 had come from personal funds, those were left on marked. i want to turn out right away to cnn political commentator, jonah goldberg, and ashley allison. national politics reporter, eva mckend. eva, let me begin with you here about the new questions around these loans. what are you learning about the loans he allegedly gave to his own campaign? laura, the blood broad outlines of the story that you mentioned, that is absolutely correct. he previously said that he personally loaned his campaign $700,000. that was in the filing. he also has reiterated, he went on that podcast with congressman matt gates not too lo
new questions about the source of substantial loans congressman george santos campaign. the embattled republican caught in a web of lies as you know previously claimed he made personal loans to his campaign totaling more than $700,000. but a new filings with the federal election commission boxes indicate that loans of 500,000 dollars and $125,000 come from personal funds well, those were left unmarked. i want you to turn to cnn commentator joan goldberg and ashley, and i have a mcken, let s begin about these questions around the loans, what are you learning about the loans he allegedly gave to his own campaign. the broad outlines of this story that you mentioned, that is absolutely correct. he previously said that he personally loaned his campaign $5 hundred,000 that was in the filing, he also i iterated this, went on the podcast with congressman matt gates not too long ago and suggested that this academy from his personal wealth. in these amended filings, he s now changin
that twitter, under its new ownership, misinformation is starting to really go wild, rampant on that. so, if it takes a weird quarter of a clock unveiling to get people to start paying attention to that stuff, then so be it. i do think we should be paying attention. i agree entirely with it would be paying attention. but it s not upping attention clock. it s not like, oh man, we ve got problems clock. it is we are seconds from total annihilation and existential erasure on the planet clock. that s how they billet. and misinformation isn t leading to that. the threat from nuclear war is coming entirely from putin, and the people who are listening to these people aren t in moscow. climate change is real, and it s a problem. but the timeline by all the experts who are most passionate about it, is very different
so if it takes a weird corner of a clock unveiling to get people to start paying attention to that stuff, then so be it because i do think we should be paying attention. i agree retiring that we should be paying attention, but it s not a paying attention clock, it s not oh man we got problems clock, it s we re seconds from total annihilation and extent shall eraser on the planet clock. and this information isn t leading to that. the threat from nuclear war is coming entirely from putin and people listening to those people aren t in moscow climate change is real and a problem but the timeline by all the experts who are most passionate about it is very different than like nuclear war tomorrow. it is, and maybe telling everybody that we are seconds from the apocalypse, which is what so much of twitter and social media does already, is part of the problem. because it keeps everybody in a state of panic.
Corona-Newsblog: RKI-Chef Wieler warnt: Dritte Welle hat begonnen ksta.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ksta.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.