new questions about the source of substantial loans congressman george santos campaign. the embattled republican caught in a web of lies as you know previously claimed he made personal loans to his campaign totaling more than $700,000. but a new filings with the federal election commission boxes indicate that loans of 500,000 dollars and $125,000 come from personal funds well, those were left unmarked. i want you to turn to cnn commentator joan goldberg and ashley, and i have a mcken, let s begin about these questions around the loans, what are you learning about the loans he allegedly gave to his own campaign. the broad outlines of this story that you mentioned, that is absolutely correct. he previously said that he personally loaned his campaign $5 hundred,000 that was in the filing, he also i iterated this, went on the podcast with congressman matt gates not too long ago and suggested that this academy from his personal wealth. in these amended filings, he s now changin
so if it takes a weird corner of a clock unveiling to get people to start paying attention to that stuff, then so be it because i do think we should be paying attention. i agree retiring that we should be paying attention, but it s not a paying attention clock, it s not oh man we got problems clock, it s we re seconds from total annihilation and extent shall eraser on the planet clock. and this information isn t leading to that. the threat from nuclear war is coming entirely from putin and people listening to those people aren t in moscow climate change is real and a problem but the timeline by all the experts who are most passionate about it is very different than like nuclear war tomorrow. it is, and maybe telling everybody that we are seconds from the apocalypse, which is what so much of twitter and social media does already, is part of the problem. because it keeps everybody in a state of panic.