new questions about the source of substantial loans congressman george santos campaign. the embattled republican caught in a web of lies as you know previously claimed he made personal loans to his campaign totaling more than $700,000. but a new filings with the federal election commission boxes indicate that loans of 500,000 dollars and $125,000 come from personal funds well, those were left unmarked. i want you to turn to cnn commentator joan goldberg and ashley, and i have a mcken, let s begin about these questions around the loans, what are you learning about the loans he allegedly gave to his own campaign. the broad outlines of this story that you mentioned, that is absolutely correct. he previously said that he personally loaned his campaign $5 hundred,000 that was in the filing, he also i iterated this, went on the podcast with congressman matt gates not too long ago and suggested that this academy from his personal wealth. in these amended filings, he s now changin
this incident was heinous, reckless, and inhumane and in the vain of transparency, when the video is released in the coming days you will see this for yourselves. i expect you to feel outraged in the disregard of basic human rights as our police officers have taken an oath to do the opp opposite of what transpired on the video. good morning we re glad you could join us, i m live in memphis. poppy is in new york. and kaitlan is on assignment. any day now the video of the beating that led to tyre nichols death will be released. we re live on the ground for you. look again, the national archives weighing whether to ask former presidents and vice presidents to check for any classified documents. what four presidents told cnn. plus this. the administrator down played the report from the teacher and the possibility of a gun saying, and i quote, well, he has little pockets. this is outrageous. more questions this morning about the 6-year-old who shot this shot his teacher.
varnish he spilled so he could sue home depot. that s a half million dollar question this morning. where did george santos get his money? the new york republicans congressional campaign amended ten filings on tuesday. and this is the big one, $500,000. see that box? it s marked personal funds of the candidate? it is unchecked in the new filing. is it an oversight or a change there? where did that money come from? manu raju tracked down the congressman who said he didn t know anything about his filings. why did you amend your f. e.c. reports. le s make it clear, i don t amend anything. i don t touch my f.e.c. stuff. don t be disingenuous and report i did. every campaign hires fiduciaries so i m not aware of that answer. eva mckend is live for us.
went on the podcast with congressman matt gates not too long ago and suggested that this academy from his personal wealth. in these amended filings, he s now changing his story, the box to indicate that these are personal funds are now not checked but also really usually here, laura, he s still listed as a source of the loan elsewhere in the filings. so you know, i don t know if confusion is the point here but that s the out come, our colleague trying to get answers from him today, take a listen. why did you amend your fec report let s make the clear, i don t amend anything, i don t touch my fec stuff, don t be disingenuous, every campaign hires fiduciaries i don t have an answer. this should coming that he often says that he will have an answer for the press and then you can hear him there trying to
could have pushed money not his to his campaign. reporter: so i also asked that expert are these type of amendments common? i was curious. he said not this volume, the steady stream of amendments is unusual, don. i ve got to ask you, eva. this new reporting about whether he lied about the treasure on these documents. what is that about? if filings yesterday officials listed thomas datwyler as the treasure but datwyler tells cnn he declined that roll. so this is perplexing here. the treasure listed on the documents says, listen, i didn t do this, i didn t make these authorizations. what is going on here is the big question, don. eva you ll be following it as