Mnuchin this morning bob with the wild week for stocks rick and the bond market bob bob, we start with you its another choppy day hopefully will end a little more stable than we started below this week was 22. 80. Were well off of the lows for the week but still down today. Off of the lows for this morning. In terms of sectors, its been all over the place all week. For once energy is leading but that was the opposite earlier in the week Consumer Staples are the week one. Banks have been generally under performing the entire week just want to point out the consumer names every one was talking about. Campbell, smuckers a and the food stocks were up. For the last day and a half they have been selling off. I want to point out the bond etfs high yield bonds the junk bonds down on higher chances. Theres 3 currently muin bonds weak. They do the convention center. They fund the transit systems. Quite across the board one bit of solace is the vix is quieting down. If you call in the 60s quieten
Millions along to you i said did you agree with that assessment of i mean this is serious stuff we could law for 23000000. 00 on pools of amphitheatres in a country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept. No its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a lot more Constitutional Court ruling that said jacob zuma should pay some money but it also ruled against the National Assembly that you speak saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a sister of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliament or the National Assembly
Millions along to you i said did you agree with that assessment of i mean this is serious stuff we could law for 23000000. 00 on pools of amphitheatres in a country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept lets use no its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a Landmark Constitutional Court ruling that said. Jacob zuma should pay some money but it also ruled against the National Assembly that you were speaker saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a speaker of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliament or the N
Millions along to you i said did you agree with that assessment of i mean this is serious stuff we could law for 23000000. 00 on pools of amphitheatres in a country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept a net and lets use no its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a Landmark Constitutional Court ruling that said. Jacob zuma should pay some money but it also ruled against the National Assembly that you were speaker saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a speaker of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliamen
A country where half the population lives on less than 5. 00 a day you accept lets use no its not a question of accepting or not accepting part of the challenge that we have is that part of that is actually Government Property which was actually for purposes of ensuring that there are Health Facilities nearby for the president to be able to be looked after or any of the stuff in 2016 there was a lot more Constitutional Court ruling that said. Jacob zuma should pay some money back it also ruled against the National Assembly that you were speaker saying you would quote fail to fulfill its constitutional obligations to hold the president accountable thats a thats an indictment of you years a speaker of parliament is not an indictment of an individual because the individual actually does not determine the position that parliament or the National Assembly actually end up taking. Democratic alliance versus speaker of the National Assembly shall you because i am the leader and therefore on be