Local matches for additional funds. So, in order to make a big dent in the needs and to fund them, the task force is recommending three new Revenue Sources, two 500 million in Revenue Bonds in a year and year after dedicated to improvements. And second vehicle license fee which has been set at 2 persona number of decades and early 2000s to 2. 6 5 and increased the vlf to its full 2 percent cap in reservation for the task force and a couple years later proposing a sales tax dedicated to city improvement. This is the projected plan for the next 15 years. Whats happening next year . Thats going to depend on the board of supervisors to develop the time to do so. Your recommendation for new revenue is so far in the future. My question is at least, last year, 5 years ago when we were going through planning did you identify Revenue Sources that are being utilized today. Im looking for something more in the shortterm. As part of the Transportation Task force work we did look at the existing fu
Appropriate. Again i dont have any strong feelings. I just wanted to understand that. The other thing you have no bonuses for making open space publicly accessible and i wanted to understand the rational behind that and that might discourage developers from creating open spaces that are publicly accessible. Sure. This is a common situation where you have competing goals. In western soma there is not a lot of open space and in eastern neighborhoods are you provided to require 80 square feet whether private decks or common courtyards but publicly soabl its 54 and provide half so you could provide less open space in exchange for making it publicly accessible. In this situation it was determined publicly accessible is good if that is enough of an incentive they dont want 50 of the open space reduced by a third. They want to generate as much open space as possible and that is obviously an issue in western soma. Again if we could figure out a way to make it you reach both goals so maybe not
There. The other question i had and somebody brought this up. Is there any call for metering and housing . I think we may have asked that last week and i was assured there wasnt but somebody brought that up. In the plan, in the area plan that would be adopted in the general plan there is a policy that says that we should establish a Community Stabilization policy that attempts i am paraphrasing and Affordable Housing afford and jobs and its about that balance. Separate from the plan the task force adopted a specific policy and mechanisms how you would achieve that goal and that included what people call metering which is essentially if the area fell out of balance then market rate housing is held up until that balance is restored either through publicly developed Affordable Housing or higher amounts of Affordable Housing in the private projects. That specific policy is not part of the planning code amendments that are in front of you now. That is pulled out separate and that whole issu
Enhance the system and sfand expand the city system to meet new growth and also set to pursue three new Revenue Services combined to address that significant portion of that gap and as well as to continue to support and seek additional state and federal Funding Sources to support policies that will bring in more transportation dollars into San Francisco. So, after taking a look at the needs, the task force looked it is needs to repair the core system, to enhance and expand it and is recommending more of the half of the funds be allocated towards core. The reason is we found that the vehicles are in disrepair, the facilities to maintain those vehicles need to be repaired and replaced the rails and overhead fixtures as well as all the signals are also outdated and need to be replaced and if the city attempts to add to the current Transportation System on an infrastructure that is so weak, well not be able to successfully provide the kind of reliable and safe Transportation System that th
Pursue three new Revenue Services combined to address that significant portion of that gap and as well as to continue to support and seek additional state and federal Funding Sources to support policies that will bring in more transportation dollars into San Francisco. So, after taking a look at the needs, the task force looked it is needs to repair the core system, to enhance and expand it and is recommending more of the half of the funds be allocated towards core. The reason is we found that the vehicles are in disrepair, the facilities to maintain those vehicles need to be repaired and replaced the rails and overhead fixtures as well as all the signals are also outdated and need to be replaced and if the city attempts to add to the current Transportation System on an infrastructure that is so weak, well not be able to successfully provide the kind of reliable and safe Transportation System that the riders expect and deserve. So the Investment Plans looks and streets and the fleet an