Measures, theyre we compared San Francisco to its piers according to 20 performance and the other topics you see here. Id like to highlight beginning with operating cost of mode with transit. This figure shows the total cost broken down by motor transportation. Mta is in the middle, it has higher cost. For both light rail and trolley bus rail. For example, mta operates nine fully staff, and newer has been able to operate with less staffing. The likely hood for mta higher cost, it has more vehicles than its piers. You can see that in this chart which shows the average numbers of vehicles and mid and weekday service. On a week day, mta operates between 3 and 14 times. The number of light rail operates nearly double than seattle. It makes since that mta cost are higher for these modes. When you have the operating cost as we have done with mid rail, theres a correlation between the two variables. This chart make its clear that mta cost are in line the train established. The mta cost are hi
There has been an acknowledgement of the special places around San Francisco bay. Well, there is something sort of innate in human beings, i think, that tend to recognize a good spot when you see it, a spot that takes your breath away. This is one of them. An icon of the new deal. We stood here a week ago and we heard all of these dignitaries talk about the symbol that coit tower is for San Francisco. Its interesting for those of us in the pioneer park project is trying to make the point that not only the tower, not only this manbuilt edifice here is a symbol of the city but also the green space on which it sits and the hill to which is rests. To understand them, you have to understand the topography of San Francisco. Early days of the city, the city grows up in what is the financial district on the edge of chinatown. Everything they rely on for existence is the golden gate. Its of massive importance to the people what comes in and out of San Francisco bay. They cant see it where they
Zoned residential it is considered a preference one site by the wireless guidelines its a publicly used structure by the San Francisco department of education it will have 9 Panel Antennas located in 3 different locations on the roof or sectors with 3 antennas per sector and the cabinets will be placed on the roof set back from the facade so finally, visible for the adjacent neighbor to the north. The site features an existing making facility for sprint curling working with sprint to relowest the antenna into roof mounted location for preservation guidelines. The care, he held multiple Community Meetings on the sf f campuses thats been withdrawn including the faculty of the university as well as Community Members and students. The noticing was held in residence and raised concerns about the Health Concerns and staff has determined the project compiles with the issues relating to the antennas it complies with the planning code and they recommend you approve the project thank you project
Exemption from Environmental Review impact study a study is needed. Although my experience is anecdotal i have 13 years of experience watching those people just this morning i walked over the hill there was 80 people standing there looking around and pointing out and looking at the fantastic view over the vacant lot towards downtown looking the other way and trying to fwouth i figure out tout how to get over to coit tower this is where the bus stops people get off and the exact spot where people across the road to walk up the beautiful new steps to coit tower. In the not a safe place to have the project while people come up ill call more names calling names . Commissioner president wu and commissioners to supplement Telegraph Hill dwellers were passing out a letter prepared by lawrence a Geotechnical Engineering addressing the technical investigation that was used by the Planning Department to evaluate the impacts of the proposed project. My name is naps im speaking as cochair of the P
The cottage. So the issue on the cottage was to explained it was authorized to have a variance it was approved for a variance in the 4 or 5. In 997 a permit ways issued to allow the construction the construction happened they went through a series of inspections and candid thats not the most unusual but noefrls nonetheless it is supposed to happen and on the conditions of the lot to move forward option one is to sort of propose a new variance have that reauthorized to close out the permit that requires additional novs we delay this project option two to go back and take back the variance and restore it after the discusses is with the Zoning Administrator we could move forward today im asking the City Attorney whether or not thats legal. Commissioner president wu kate and the City Attorneys office if i understand what was explained to you the original variance may not have been final because theres no final certificate of occupancy its no a recession of the variance just as to those var