january 6th, i issued a tweet demanding that people leave the capitol and end the violence. i said that those that failed to do that should be prosecuted to the fullest exat the present time of the law and i continue to believe that today. we cannot ever allow what happened on january 6th to happen again in the heart of our democracy. and i ll stand by the decisions and the due process of court in our laws. and i have no interest or no intention of pardoning those that assaulted police officers or vandalized our capital. they need to be answerable to the law. former vice president mike pence with one of the ways he is differentiating himself from his former boss. we ll have more from his campaign launch just ahead. it comes as the department of justice confirms what we all suspected. trump is the target of the classified documents investigation. we ll get expert analysis on what it means for an indictment moving forward. plus, one of the pga s top players blasts the organiz
[ cheering and applause ] greg yes. Alright. I have to say i agree with all of you. Happy monday everyone. Im sure youve heard in the new book admits to slaughtering a puppy because she didnt like it so as our vp, chances plummet and one man spoke up and said dont judge her, she had her reasons and you still have the puppy lying around. What . Heats dogs. You wouldnt think that would let that pass . She claims she shot the dog because i had an aggressive personality but isnt the definition of aggressive personality shooting a puppy . [laughter] anyway, i bet her kids are well behaved. Later, open fire on Campus Protesters once she heard they were in pup tents. And i heard alec baldwin wants to hire her for a remake of benji. Its either that or 100 dalmatians. Every sql gets less and less. 99. President joe biden tapped steven spielberg, the director behind e. T. To tell joes story and has a lot in common and that neither one knows how to get home. A dolly parton launching her own line
contradicts his statement from earlier in the day. it s a trick question, joe. yeah, rightly, looking at that, and we hear this all the time. first of all, if you re running for president of neither party you re going to be asked that question if you say no you don t have a chance to win. let me say they now have that as a requirement of the debate. i think everybody understands this is a phony question, they understand that donald trump will be asked this question. they understand that donald trump may lie about this question saying yes, of course i will but i m going to win. and then after he answers that question and loses, of course he will not support the person and do everything he can if it s ron desantis to stop ron desantis from being elected. i understand people focussing on the process question but it is a process question. you have to check the box, then you can move forward and start your campaign. i strongly suspect that many of
limited and told to only work for a week? that s a great question, joy. so in the normal course in light of the agreement between the fbi and the white house that governs background investigations, the white house does essentially control and guide the investigation, the depth and the duration of a background investigation. as opposed to a criminal investigation which the fbi does with no white house involvement. so that is the way it normally works. of course this is not a normal background investigation in any way. and so here if the fbi in interviewing some witnesses develops other leads and feels as though it should interview additional witnesses and the white house is seen as trying to curtail that or limit that, i think that we re going to be right back to where we were yesterday, which is many observers thinking this is not a fair, full process and that s
questions. they would have had the courage to do the questioning themselves and not use the show of having a woman brought in who was a sex crime prosecutor to do the questioning. who they yanked as soon as she started to ask all she did is asked the question that could have led to something really interesting about the july 1st where all the people that dr. blasey ford said were at the scene of the crime, all of a sudden she was silenced. this is not a search for truth. and they have already announced exactly what they are expecting the outcome to be. we re going to push this through. he s going to be confirmed. we need to hear the facts. let them confirm one way or the other who s telling the truth. let s look at ramirez. let s look at swetnick. we need to hear all of the witnesses. his college roommate said he was often drunk. we need to look at his history of drinking and whether his outburst on the day of the hearing thursday shows that he is still a mean alcoholic