Delayed our recirculated draft on the Hazard Reduction measures. So this map i wont go into in great detail but just to say that our proposals include demolitions of 10 buildings, developing new housing by renovating uc Hall Building on the campus and constructing new faculty housing as well as converting existing house is to faculty housing and managing our open space reserve as permitted open space as well as improving other public open spaces on the campus. This slide speaks to the 1976 regents resolution which the regents adopted in order to place limitations on the campus. The new ordinance proposes to update that resolution by the open space reserve, reaffirming the campus boundaries on the blackout line as well as the expansion and restriction areas shown in the shaded area. We are restricted from leasing residential space in that shaded area around the campus. We also are continuing to have the space ceiling or limit on total space structures on the site of 35 million square fe
Mission bay and 200 exam roops. So since i was here before you in april of 2013, the following change and events have occurred. I want to call your attention to that. We acquired a block to mission 34 and mission bay and Affordable Housing and infrastructure since we are tax exempt. We also are proposing to update the 1976 region resolution. We have identified the developer with which we are negotiating a ground lease for our lower campus site. The Golden State Warriors announced they are proposing a complex in the arena directly across third street from our campus. We have published our draft lrdp eir and we delayed our recirculated draft on the Hazard Reduction measures. So this map i wont go into in great detail but just to say that our proposals include demolitions of 10 buildings, developing new housing by renovating uc Hall Building on the campus and constructing new faculty housing as well as converting existing house is to faculty housing and managing our open space reserve as
On the campus. The new ordinance proposes to update that resolution by the open space reserve, reaffirming the campus boundaries on the blackout line as well as the expansion and restriction areas shown in the shaded area. We are restricted from leasing residential space in that shaded area around the campus. We also are continuing to have the space ceiling or limit on total space structures on the site of 35 million square feet and excluding that from housing. It would include all nonresidential buildings within the campus site. We are aintaining housing functional zone 135th avenue to create a buffer to the neighborhood, and we are updating the average daily population goal which i would speak to in a minute. So this slide is difficult to read and i wont and necessarily go through every line. I just want to call your attention to the top line and the bottom line. So, the top line that says 2014 space applicable to the space ceiling currently exceeds the 35. 5 million by 8. 3 percent.
Before we can move into the minutes commissioners i want to let you know that there was a photo copying error with the agenda and so the second page is missing but what is missing is just the president s report, or the Vice President s report, the standard items so, the president has a full copy, and we will read you through that. And all right, item number 2, is general Public Comment, and allows the members of the public to comment on matters within the commissioners purview and considers new items for the future consideration. Do we have any members of the public that would like to make a comment . Seeing number. Item three is approval of the july, 14th, meeting minutes. I move. That was commissioner riley . Yes. Moved. And they have been approved. Item four is discussion and possible action to make recommendations to the board of supervisors, and on file number 1 40724, nighttime entertainment and general uses greater than 250,000 square feet in the western soma area, this ordinanc
Only the population today by the population in the future and identify them and try to build where we can courage thats just for the public those are guidelines those are things that state general plan policies but dont not deal with any particular projects they does not dictate you know approvals or disapprovals of projects and to some of the discussion thats gone on by not building more market rate housing we only make the situation worse because theres more competition for whats here we opg those people are coming to San Francisco people want to be here and drive up prices of what exists weve got to continue to build as much housing as possible and certainly the market rate housing helps it takes stress off the existing stock a couple of questions for staff i was looking at the section on meeting affordability goals and the number given to San Francisco looks at accurate based on weve weve built, however, those counties dont make sense coming from alameda and Santa Clara County for