We need nor time the 14 days at least before the next hearing we need a chance for input we should be brought to the tackle not at the public hearings to prolong o prolong and waste peoples thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Can i ask staff to first address the question of the addendum and some explanation of what the addendum is and when i expect it to be available. Good afternoon xhishthsz pardon me im dealing with the imply the addendum is curling being prepared in the draft stage on addendum 2 the eir im sure youre aware of has been recently certified and found valid by the courts the current spelling the last for the record schedule at the end of the month i think the requirement is needs to be done and final list prior to the action by the commission kate can you comment on that i think thats the correct timing for the addendum. Kate and the City Attorneys Office the eir has to be 3re79d bet the Planning Commission makes
Prolong o prolong and waste peoples thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Can i ask staff to first address the question of the addendum and some explanation of what the addendum is and when i expect it to be available. Good afternoon xhishthsz pardon me im dealing with the imply the addendum is curling being prepared in the draft stage on addendum 2 the eir im sure youre aware of has been recently certified and found valid by the courts the curnt spelling the last for the record schedule at the end of the month i think the requirement is needs to be done and final list prior to the action by the commission kate can you comment on that i think thats the correct timing for the addendum. Kate and the City Attorneys Office the eir has to be 3re79d bet the Planning Commission makes a decision not to say it would be made available earrings it needs to be finalized. Im sorry kate theres no review process with the addendum the nature of t
Here its a its a 12kw50ish8 place we need to address not only the population today by the population in the future and identify them and try to build where we can courage thats just for the public those are guidelines those are things that state general plan policies but dont not deal with any particular projects they does not dictate you know approvals or disapprovals of projects and to some of the discussion thats gone on by not building more market rate housing we only make the situation worse because theres more competition for whats here we opg those people are coming to San Francisco people want to be here and drive up prices of what exists weve got to continue to build as much housing as possible and certainly the market rate housing helps it takes stress off the existing stock a couple of questions for staff i was looking at the section on meeting affordability goals and the number given to San Francisco looks at accurate based on weve weve built, however, those counties dont m
History. And also serve as economic engines attracting tourists and locals alike. We appreciate the addition and new policies to the rows update including policy 1. 12 which recognizes the value of Historic Buildings and landscapes. Also policy 1. 13 which requires the city to identify and preserve Historic Landscapes, buildings, structures, and objects within city parks. We are concerned, however, that the language of the last sentence of policy 1. 13 allows the city to determine the appropriate treatment based on quote publicly provided benefit by the proposed [speaker not understood]. We believe that should be the priority of the policy because the city already takes into account Public Benefit when making decisions on proposed projects. Additionally, we think that provision should be included in the element that will ensure the protection of lesser known and or undesignated Historic Resources located within the citys parks and open space. For example, the york mini park located on
Ms. Wellpoint. Good afternoon, im nancy werful. I ask you to strengthen the [speaker not understood] as open space and not relegated to being raw land that is for development with no structureseses. A city policy that purports itself to preserving existing open space must actually do that, bernanke, and by specifically preventing New Buildings on the land that the city has said is open space. As the city grows more dense, so does the pressure to use our open space as just conveniently available publicly owned vacant land for building dujure. To protect our parks as open space for future generations, the 2013 draft row should have unequivocal restrictions against New Buildings. Our city policy has assisted in restricting development so we actually have saved many areas as open space. The draft rows has now weakened the preservation mandate. I call upon this commission as the appropriate body to request changes to safeguard the existing open space and landscapes to be made in the draft r