other politicians and officials. what is causing the spike of violent attacks targeting government officials? going one-on-one with an entire retired fbi special agents to administer the trend. and the bill passed by some ohio republicans will try to keep trans athletes out of women s sports by sending them to a doctor for a gentle inspection. on this first weekend of pride month we will analyze the gop s growing attacks on the lgbtq community. with my guests to the president and ceo of glaad. all of that and more is coming up. good sunday morning to. olivia i m katie fang. we will take into this questions with our experts later. but first, report on the ground to bring you the latest news. we begin with the january 6th hearings kicking off this thursday in primetime. nbc s dairy gronk is on capitol hill. gary, it is always a pressure to see you. americans finally are getting a look at what the committee does kind of looking behind the curtain. what should we expect to
partisan food fight. as long as no one is actually having to pay the price of accountability, legally, with indictments, with the gop is going to say as this is just a witch hunt, the democrats are going after us, don t pay any attention. if this were real there would be indictments. that s why i come back to the work of the department of justice and the attorney general. why hasn t merrick garland, and my sources inside the department of, katie i know you had them as well, i telling me there is not a case being prepared against donald trump. there is a case against these low lying folks, like navarro, who basically confessed on air don t have the privilege that they re saying they have of executive privilege. but where is the investigation on the phone call, where donald trump asked the georgia secretary of state to find more votes? where is the prosecution of the mueller obstruction of justice charges three years ago. from three years, ago right. the fact that we re not seeing
anything. bret: so one of the points s lanhee: but i will say one thing, one thing i did pick up which is interesting, there s building in the democratic house to expand the articles of impeachment and include the mueller obstruction of justice. there are a lot of democrats that don t want to do that. and some of them are in leadership. bret: for bumper sticker gets a little bit longer to tell the american people what you re doing if you are explaining this and that after him robert mueller testified to all he testified up on capitol hill. mollie: this is becoming a worst-case political scenario for the democrats appear they wanted to do this quickly which why they didn t fight for fact witnesses. bret: you are talking about john bolton, mick mulvaney. mollie: someone that is not popular but less popular, it is so crushingly boring. and you also have a situation where as it drags on less time spent on what democrats were moderates able to win-controlled seats. they are n
many things including bribery, corrupting our electoral process, extorting a foreign country using federally appropriated dollars. there s a lot that could go into that. the question is whether you break out into a separate article, bribery, separate from that broader abuse of power. then you have contempt, obstruction of congress and that is where many things could also go into because so much has been obstructed under this administration, many different investigations, including ukraine, including russia. the biggest question and the biggest unknown and the most shaky is that obstruction of justice including anything related to anything but ukraine. so you have people who do want to roll in the mueller obstruction of justice. you have others, you have leadership urging everyone to keep their eye on the ball and to know that you really have to sell this in a very coherent, clean way to the american people. do you really want to fold that in.
page 419 replied hell no and then added viva la resistance. attorney two in the inspector general s report and strzok both worked on your team, didn t they? pardon me? they both worked on your team. who else were you talking about? attorney number two in the general s report. did he work for you? peter strzok worked for me for a period of time, yes. so did the other guy who said vaoefsh ja la resistance. when people associated with trump lied you threw the book at them. when christopher steele lied nothing. it seems to be that when glenn simpson met with russians, nothing. when the trump campaign met with russians 3500 words. maybe the reason why there are these discrepancies is that you were biased and wanted to stop trump. mueller obstruction of justice is a serious crime that strikes at the core to find the truth, correct?