State acity of new york. Text and tradition make clear that new york city restricted premises license and accompanying transport bannekers constitutional. To transport the continuous and uninterrupted premised on a view of the Second Amendment as homebound right. With any ability to venture beyond the curtilage with the firearm even locked and unloaded a matter of government grace. That view is and can student with text history tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment to protect rights to keep and bear arms. That letter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protect rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analogue for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or training may occur that the
Beginning of this litigation. The reason they filed this lawsuit five years ago was to try to vindicate their rights under the Second Amendment. Up until the point that the Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, the city of new york had resisted their efforts to vindicate their rights in every turn and only when the Supreme Court granted the certiorari petition in this case did the city start to take efforts to try to recognize their rights. The court asked a lot of questions today about those continuing efforts by the city to try to make this case go away but they also asked very important questions about the merits that made clear that this is part and parcel of the kind of regulations that have no basis in text history or tradition and should not be upheld consistent with the Second Amendment so we are very hopeful that the court will decide this case on the merits and in favor of the petitioners but in all that we are very gratified we had our day in court to vindicate thes
In less than 5 years. And im Peter Simmons with all day sports tiger woods captains the usa today with the president s cup influence. For the bolivian president evo morales is an argentina and has been granted Refugee Status thats according to the times foreign minister but alice was living in mexico since last month after he was granted political asylum when he was forced to step down and leave bolivia following mass protests after a disputed election lets bring in our correspondent tereza bush is joining us live from buenos i it is so what more do we know about this to raise and was it expected. Well bolivia 1st indigenous president arrived very early in the morning year when off site is after leaving mexico last week towards cuba where apparently he was treated for some small. All Health Issues he came here and hes a rival does not come as a surprise because theres been a change in government in argentina from the center right government of. Very close to the United States or now ha
Leadership as at all other interAgency Meetings on this topic of which i was aware the National Security Community Expressed unanimous support for resuming the funding as in the u. S. National security interest at the july 26th meeting there was also a discussion of how ukrainian anticorruption efforts were making progress do you do you reiterated what we had said and our earlier certification to congress stating that sufficient progress in defense reform including anticorruption had occurred to justify the usa i spending. I and others at the interAgency Meetings felt that the matter was particularly urgent because it takes time to obligate that amount of money and my understanding was that the money was legally required to be obligated by september 30th the end of the fiscal year in the ensuing weeks until the hold was released on september 11th i pursued 3 tracks 1st starting on july 31st and an interAgency Meeting i made clear to the interagency leadership my understanding that once
Beginning of this litigation. And the reason they filed this lawsuit five years ago was to try to vindicate their rights under the Second Amendment. Up until the point that the Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, the city of new york resisted their efforts to vindicate their right at every turn and only when the Supreme Court granted certiorari petition in this case did the city start to take efforts to try to recognize their rights. The court asked a lot of questions today about those continuing efforts by the city to try to make this case go away but they also asked very important questions about the merits that made clear that this is part and parcel of the kind of regulations that have no basis in text, history, or tradition and shout not be upheld consistent with the Second Amendment, so were very, very hopeful that the court will decide this case on the merits and in favor of the petitioners but were very gratified that we ad our day in court to vindicate these importa