nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
year s presidential election. they fear handing democrats a blang de k check if they keep the white house in 2020 four .tr here s some republicans like about the bill. one , itan capd caps ns nondefe spending growth by no more thann one percent in 202 0 four and 2020 five to the bill does claw back . twenty eight billion dollars in unspent covid funds three . it officially cancele, it ofs bn student loan porres repayments now restart the end ofoes not en the summer, but it doesn t end them for a marginally expands work requirements for certain social programs like food stamps. requ five funding to biden s insaneio cial80 billion plan to double2 e the size of the irs. that will be cut by one point b four billion dollars a year. but a fayear.r cry fromr the re the republican bill thatram slashed the program completely. and , another to cnn 20 billion will be repurposed in 2020 four and 2020 five ,t quote, this provision does note appear in the text otef the bilb but another source famili
away from both the senatewhite o and the white house. and that is s , frankly,a a historical experience, comparablehi to what we did in 1995. yeah, and then, well, i meane ,remember, biden startedd out a saying he wouldn t compromise at all. t aland then went missing in acn for ninety seven days. let s get your takeget yo on the bilurl. the well, i agree with former speaker gingrichl. to a point. t that is to say that the bill rep that republicans passeublid on the floor of the house with 218 votes was a great bill and we were unified inand o doing it. i know something about that. we created the unity when we went through the speaker s fight in january . nee problebe in the probm is thn speaker mccarthy entered into this negotiationgo, he gave upgi the farm. speaker gingrich describeschcris a bunch of benefits. we ve spoken earlier about thi s of t he wrote an article on fox news about it and listed a lot of these things. when you read the text ofther the bill, they re not there. a
nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet another nego
promise of the republicans to tano defund the hiring or the doubling of the irs agentse . why didn t they hold the line i or that on that? d and i don ont think was we ar unreasonable, the republicans to say we re going to goe back to twenty, twenty three spending levels with a 1% baseline budgeting cap. to me, they were reasonable provisions and i can understand people s anger at that because that seemed the irs in particular seem to be a big- is issue for republicans. mr. spe mr. speaker?i un well, as iders understand, wentt back , i thought congressman bishop was very effectivn bieece on your show this afternoon. so effective t thathe spt i wenf back to the speaker s staffout o and talked to them aboutme oe i. several of these issues. and all i can reportreported tor this year, they don t havet the money to hire the additional agents. and this fall in the appropriations bill , republicans will have every opportunit every to continuet process. agrin, this is the one yea the is a