nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
away from both the senatewhite o and the white house. and that is s , frankly,a a historical experience, comparablehi to what we did in 1995. yeah, and then, well, i meane ,remember, biden startedd out a saying he wouldn t compromise at all. t aland then went missing in acn for ninety seven days. let s get your takeget yo on the bilurl. the well, i agree with former speaker gingrichl. to a point. t that is to say that the bill rep that republicans passeublid on the floor of the house with 218 votes was a great bill and we were unified inand o doing it. i know something about that. we created the unity when we went through the speaker s fight in january . nee problebe in the probm is thn speaker mccarthy entered into this negotiationgo, he gave upgi the farm. speaker gingrich describeschcris a bunch of benefits. we ve spoken earlier about thi s of t he wrote an article on fox news about it and listed a lot of these things. when you read the text ofther the bill, they re not there. a