nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
five omar six trillion dollar increase in debt that we just h let him have. and the speaker says he madecal. the call. i don i don t undet understand that.ok and it just it doesn t make sense. i it is .t it fractured republican unity that was so hard won. we re going to have to figurehak out how to put that back together.er. i don t know what happens with the congress and with . ncrat votes now, you talked earlieeer about the need maybe for a motionmccat to vacate when whenhy kevin mccarthy became speaker. that was an issue any one member can basically call for this. noemember, bically, confidence n the speaker. you said earlier today that s under consideration. can you believe that s going to happen? what i said, john , is that itis seems inescapable to me, given what has occurred and the way he was the steward of b republican unity and he blew. to smithereens. but there was sea one repo that said you woulguy d be the a that did it. that s notthat how i said it. thini m not i do
promise of the republicans to tano defund the hiring or the doubling of the irs agentse . why didn t they hold the line i or that on that? d and i don ont think was we ar unreasonable, the republicans to say we re going to goe back to twenty, twenty three spending levels with a 1% baseline budgeting cap. to me, they were reasonable provisions and i can understand people s anger at that because that seemed the irs in particular seem to be a big- is issue for republicans. mr. spe mr. speaker?i un well, as iders understand, wentt back , i thought congressman bishop was very effectivn bieece on your show this afternoon. so effective t thathe spt i wenf back to the speaker s staffout o and talked to them aboutme oe i. several of these issues. and all i can reportreported tor this year, they don t havet the money to hire the additional agents. and this fall in the appropriations bill , republicans will have every opportunit every to continuet process. agrin, this is the one yea the is a