nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
promise of the republicans to tano defund the hiring or the doubling of the irs agentse . why didn t they hold the line i or that on that? d and i don ont think was we ar unreasonable, the republicans to say we re going to goe back to twenty, twenty three spending levels with a 1% baseline budgeting cap. to me, they were reasonable provisions and i can understand people s anger at that because that seemed the irs in particular seem to be a big- is issue for republicans. mr. spe mr. speaker?i un well, as iders understand, wentt back , i thought congressman bishop was very effectivn bieece on your show this afternoon. so effective t thathe spt i wenf back to the speaker s staffout o and talked to them aboutme oe i. several of these issues. and all i can reportreported tor this year, they don t havet the money to hire the additional agents. and this fall in the appropriations bill , republicans will have every opportunit every to continuet process. agrin, this is the one yea the is a