Was separated into two items, items 10 and 11. For members of the public who are calling or listening in the webex web webinar. The password is 05 17, and the access code is 2598901. Numbers for 156550001. And im next. We have our land acknowledgment. Oh, just one moment. The Building Inspection Commission acknowledges that we are on the unseated ancestral homeland of the remotest aloni, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions. The re matich aloni have never seated, lost or forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place , as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. As guests. We recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders and relatives of the remote official learning community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. Tha
And sepg the projeaccepting th one bedroom down in this illegal unit. Currently there is a notice on this unit. It does not meet the current Building Code. Theres not existing ventilation, its very apparent that the unit itself has no Building Permits for it. So the we have to actually restructure the the unit here, and as i said, we were open and actually our clients have sent an email assuring them that there would be a one bedroom changing it from a studio, and unfortunately, they werent able to come to any agreement, so as i said, were in support of taking dr and actually accepting the plan as proposed. Thank you. Vice president richards thank you. Any additional comments from the project sponsors team . Seeing none, Public Comment in support of the project sponsor. Seeing none, dr requestor, you have two minutes to rebut. [ inaudible ]. Yes, initially there was an email that said fine, we agree, and then, they didnt agree anymore. I mean, the Planning Department knows this. The Pl
Public works the office of chief commercial we want walk the project site when we sign up and also with a contractor insinuates for a change over we need to verify what or what was instead of. The building is 42 feet tall so it is two stories and 46 thousand square feet roughly were thats a great question to be on time and budget have the roof complete a the exterior moving with the site work. And as you can see weve got a lot of the interior finishes installed. In an effort of an differentiate the facility that designed to work for 72 hours. Not taking into account there was a lot of structural updates made into this building not seen in other construction throughout San Francisco or other barriers we have friday morning examiners from 8 to one Public Comment monday to friday because of air circulation we literally have to shut the doors and so the autopsy is done without staffing being able to come and go or exit the space and literally lock down the autopsy in the new facility we ha
Department we issue thousands of permits a year. And i dont want to minimize this, but i really think what were dealing with here is a small fraction of a group of people who seem to be continuously coming across and doing the bad apple the bad projects here. I see as i breakdown today, i think one thing to start with i kind of direct my comments the the director and as a commission i think this is something Going Forward this year is going to be one of the top issues, is and mr. Duffy touched on it there, representations on the professional plans submitted to the department. And i think that is something we need to really focus on and have a purer policy and what is the consequences if you submit a set of plans not reflective of exactly the work of the permit issued. I think we could do a lot better job on that. I myself was very involved last year in discussions with contractors who are dealing with this on a daily basis and we had worked on some policy and procedures we did submit t
Those from a seismic perspective, the just of replacing windows in building one, for example, will be a significant expense. So from a seismic preservation and also from an access perspective, building one has never had elevator access above the second floor. So well have to figure out how well get to the third and fourth floors with elevator access. As part of that, we would also include an assessment of what it would take to environmentally control some of those buildings, as theyre currently all steamheated to the extent theyre heated at all and naturally ventilated. This will require some Environmental Control as well as potentially some natural lighting control. So that will be one of the aspects going forward, given these Historic Buildings, because of their size, give us the ability to display the pieces as a collection. The other alternative would be to display one or more of them in separate locations or on a rotating basis, but thats going to be part of our evaluation for our