This is a summary of the tables that youll see in the report that you have in your packet they come for the Controllers Office from 13 and 14 the biological for the stabilization is 9. 9 infrastructure is 21 million and thats itself entire amount that goes to planning for the amount that was transferred over from planning into the selma Stabilization Fund is 4. 9 million that does include the two types of infrastructure and the melrose bond as well as the direct fees paid by vendors to go into a little bit more detail about the broader Infrastructure Fund our colleague from the department is here. Good morning, supervisors from planning what im talking about here is the infrastructure the rincon Hill Community infrastructure fees which are spent on Capital Projects within the rincon hill boundary we do on annual 5 year expenditure plan so there the interagency Plan Implementation Committee that programs those fund as well the fund from the other impacts fooedz feeds such as the octavia
I think its been more of a priorities what needs are in the community our our knowledge of the availability of fund finding out whether or not theres an Expiration Date it is more like us prior tigdz the needs thats how the process has been in the beginning. Did you ask the Mayors Office of housing was the priorities they go to services the shoigsdz of the club house and the infrastructure is it the committees that today in terms of or do you direct staff to help to guide you. Most relevance weve created those different categories of where we want the fund to go whether in housing or jobs we get approached by Community Orchards for their needs we try to align them we get update on how much in each category but in terms of spending them quickly what are the needs of like so these needs have been in expiates whats the best process for the cac if youre not hearing we need fund for straightaway streetscape improvement if youre ignited by the community not by mow or the cac whats the best w
Its just simply shocking that this is going on to the extent it is in our country right in a ribald way on the internet. Law enforcement officials and antitrafficking organizations say there are a number of key indicators that allow them to identify ads that are likely for Trafficking Victims. In this advertisement we see three key of those key indicators. First, the title states the victim is new to your city. Antitrafficking organizations say this is code for being underage. You may also see girls in ads described as young fresh or new in town, to indicate they are underage. Second we see a victim is listed from outside the area. Here she is listed as from miami for a posting thats in the houston area. And third the victim also has an outofarea phone number. Those are three indicators of what this ad is to sell sex with children. Law enforcement and experts confirm this point. The Cook County Sheriffs Office in illinois found that 100 of women claiming 100 of women claiming to be mas
Make decisions that might put them at increased risk for stds because its not their priority at the time. We are hoping as we might understand this that we might learn from the people themselves what maybe helpful to them and their friends. We are having to go back and look at Sexual Health in a different way and understand that hiv prevention and std prevention cant be packaged together. Condoms certainly prevent both but condom use is going down in San Francisco. What can we do but to make them available and make sure they are effective and for people who do not use them what we can do to prevent them from contracting stds. We need to try to figure out the help of people we are working with and for. Thank you. Commissioner . Thank you for your presentation. As you unroll these interventions over time, i suspect well be get anger update an update on which ones worked. This comes from the Community Public health committee. So i know im not part of that anymore, but just the idea of get
Low on a national bases or on a state bases so i can get that out of my mind and consider that thats sort of normal std management and there is a level that we will always have and therefore i can ignore it and maybe i cant ignore it. I cant tell from the data. This lack of aggregation and the data that you are presenting and im sure that you do have it. Also doesnt allow whether to focus on, in chlamydia was it in, lets say the African American population for the sake of argument versus an older group of hiv or lesser. In other words i think we are not understanding the targets as well. And i think that goes to some of the Public Comment maybe some of our campaigns or not hitting the right people for the right disorders. But its hard to tell from the way that the data is aggregated now because then when we get to the African American slide, its just a lump of stds and i dont know if its actually perhaps chlamydia is a higher problem or its within youth and we know that we are talking