Guests Jesse Eisenberg Hailee Steinfeld stevmill and feuring the legendary roots crew questlove 1137 steve and now, here he is, jimmy fallon [ cheers and applause [ cheers and applause jimmy thats what im talking about. Hey. Hot crowd, i love you. Oh my gosh, thank you very much welcome, everybody welcome, welcome, welcome, to the tonight show. Youre here. [ cheers and applause you made it, im happy lets get to some news well you guys, more and more details are coming out about president trumps phone call with ukraine listen to what happened today. There is new reporting in the New York Times that a white house official told the whistleblower that president trumps call with the president of ukraine was quote, crazy and frightening. [ light laughter ] jimmy thats right the call was described as crazy and frightening. [ light laughter ] its not good when your call to a world leader gets the same review as zombieland 2. You know [ laughter ] the whistleblower went on to say that the offic
With you engage in this conduct, this is what happy ne what h. If it is knowingly engaging in bias it kicks up and you are terminated. We cant have a discipline for unconscious behavior. What this says if it is a pattern it becomes known, then the discipline is discipline then you are in the knowingly category. Give me an opportunity. I have to tell you now we have to be specific on discipline and i dont know if the public knows this. When we bring a complaint the department or dpa has to say what the punishment will be before we hear a witness or make a decision. We have tried to whatever they recommend. I see some coming through. I am appalled they can read the factual situation and tell me a certain amount of time. I think the more guidance the better. We cannot change it once they list what it is. I read this. It is very confusing. What are you suggesting to make it stronger . I would make it stronger personally. How do we punish for unconscious behavior . How many times do you say
Awareness to modify 10point 01 uniform and equipment action. Do we have somebody the speak to this item . I can speak to it. From our Community Engagement division. Good evening. Good evening. Last year we made a very passionate plea to get the Pink Patch Initiative as part of our october uniform attire. This year our hope is to make this a continuing event every october like many other departments across the united states. All we are doing this year is we have added cadets and Police Service aids and ask that it be included every year as part of our annual event with the San Francisco Police Department. I did bring pink patches for you. I will ask to please get these to you so you can actually take a look at it first hand. The goal this october is to have 100 of the officers supporting this incredible cause. The proceeds will go to bay area cancer connection which is an organization really focused on Breast Cancer awareness and the details, education across the bay area. I am open for
The filing responsibility is on the commissioner who did the recuse recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environment, you know, a department could they wouldnt actually receive notice from this process, but if they wanted to check that it happened, they could do that. Or implement another process where the commissioner had to bring a copy. But i think that would be a protocol that would have to be enforced at the commission level, that the com
Recusal. Right. Im thinking would there be some accountability that this person has recused him or herself and they filed this form. So should the Actual Department of the commission be notified . They would be aware of the actual recusal because it occurred that it occurred prior to the filing requirement. The filing requirement is a requirement imposed by the Ethics Commission. So i dont know that that would be something that they would be looking to ensure that its because the responsibility is actually on the commissioner who recused themselves. But there is again, in the public environment, you know, a department could they wouldnt actually receive notice from this process, but if they wanted to check that it happened, they could do that. Or implement another process where the commissioner had to bring a copy. But i think that would be a protocol that would have to be enforced at the commission level, that the commissioner belonged to the Planning Commission in this case. The form