senate, rather keep investigating in the house and add such supplemental articles as needed. just let it hang over his head. if the worst happens and he is re-elected, send it to the senate, but keep investigating because the president has tweeted tonight and others have said, let s get this done. you know what? we know what s going to happen in the house. let s go to the senate because he knows he s not going to get kicked out of office. this is an interesting concept. impeach and don t move forward. i like it, and certainly as i alluded to before, there are many crimes that he deserves to answer for. but i do kind of wonder, at least theoretically, if congress might not be painting a life-size map of the world if they chose to investigate everything that they could impeach him for. the list is probably almost literally endless. it might begin with election fraud but certainly it would continue to the caging of children on the border and fraud and corruption and emoluments.
answer for, but i do kind of wonder at least theoretically if congress may not be painting a live size map of the world if they choose to investigate everything they could impeach him for. the list is probably almost literally endless. you know, it might begin with election fraud but certainly it would continue to the caging of children on the border. and fraud and corruption and emoluments. i mean, really, every day like whenever i think about this white house and the crimes i think the lucy and ethel at the chocolate factory and trying to just keep up with the crimes coming out of the machine. we just couldn t do it. i would love to see them investigate more. i worry about the physics of it, basically. whether or not the time space continuum could handle it. we re going to squeeze in a break. but when we come baek we re going to talk about the efforts to expand voting rights today. this is important.
that obama wiretapped him. he colluded with russia. he violated the foreign emoluments clause and then he wrote in bloomberg that president trump should be impeached because he is going to pardon joe arpaio, the sheriff down in maricopa county. brian: how ridiculous was it that jerry nadler picked these three. i don t care what their incident electric or resume says blatantly anti-trumpers vested in seeing him ousted and can t believe that he won. steve, you pointed out about feldman. okay. gotcha. gerhart s credit he was somewhat measured in his tone but definitely direct in saying the president should be impeached. the one that looked the most partisan and unhinged is this pamela karlan of stanford. if you want to know how she really feels separate from the ukraine phone call, go back to june 2017. listen to her talk about her hatred of all things trump. listen. got off the bus from dulles down at the plaza and i walked up to the hotel and as i was walking past what
democratic caucus, about which articles of impeachment to bring forward, how large that scope should be. you know, the democratic leadership, those close to nancy pelosi, believe that the narrower focus they can focus on, meaning ukraine, the better they re able to make the case to the american public. once you start to broaden it to a emoluments and the mueller report, or russia report, from the 2016 re-election, people start to think you re trying to relitigate that election, which has been a talking point for republicans, and so this is the debate we re seeing right now, in the party. and nancy pelosi, i believe, wants to keep this narrow and focused. danny cevallos, scott wong, thank you guys both. thank you. still ahead the latest in the race for president, joe biden discusses a future spot for kamala harris, in a biden administration.
has he vai lighted the emoluments clause? don t the democrats have to figure out how broad they want to make these articles of impeachment? you talk about emoluments, well, that s broad, or do they stick to ukraine which is what these intelligence hearings were all about? do they go back to the mueller report? i think they should do all of the above, because there is a standard of conduct for the president, whoever he or she is going forward. that s the debate. we re going to learn in this debate about hearing a lot of the same stuff we ve heard about, so i think the challenge to democrats is how are they going to write this in a way that will break through to the public. i can tell you that talking to white house officials, their hope is that it s not going to