and i know that doesn t mean we shouldn t be worried and concerned and prepare, but i think that we had been seeing the death of roe v. wade. and i think that was very effective, right? it kind of was able to go under the radar in ways. it didn t mobilize people who are pro choice in the way that this is. you look at this and people get it. they want to put doctors in jail for 99 years, more than the time as the rapist. as a legal matter, right now it is 100% unconstitutional and cannot with stand scrutiny. there would have to be a drastic change. that is not really an undue burden. you can impose that.
that is you know, did special counsel come to the conclusion that no crimes were committed that were provable that could be brought? or did he make a determination that with regard to the president, it was not appropriate to bring charges because department of justice policy that would have precluded it. i suspect the answer to the question is that he found insufficient evidence. and it is a substantial finder because that of course covers not only the collision mandate but also with regard to obstruction of justice. therefore, i disagree with democratic senators that say well you know, just because robert mueller finish the investigation and didn t find criminal wrongdoing relative collusion to obstruction of justice, doesn t mean we shouldn t be pursuing it. hogwash, that s baloney. a well-founded article of impeachment would have to constitute a high crime or misdemeanor. if there is not a criminal violation with regard to obstruction of justice, or collision however, anyone wants t
anything anybody should be wishing for bad news.for anyone. we shouldn t want to see collusion. we shouldn t want to see evidence of significant problems within the administration. we do have a responsibility to look at the facts, make it clear eyed judgment about what the facts say. frankly, the picture is been painted so far is troubling. we just had robert ray on. for whitewater independent counsel. he says look, there is nobody more thorough than bob mueller. and bob mueller says you know the investigation is over, it s over! do you get the impression that democrats in congress are ready to say the same thing? i wish that that were the case. unfortunately, some running for president and some on the judiciary are already making i think there any lack of
i. have. for the first time russia and opec have arrived at an agreement to stabilize the market and exports do it all this is a first to get a license so. that we expect that these good relations between saudi arabia russia the opec and other countries will continue to head such as kazakhstan azerbaijan and oman was yet will be in and of of course what do what it also does that stand at the rigby journal much. more oil and politics of the ways gone hand in hand russia had ambitions that went well beyond the new opec plus agreement. doesn t mean we shouldn t exaggerate the
a no unless you guys can change this because of the precedent that it sets. we ll wait and see how you vote. i want to ask you about north korea. you were with otto warmbier s family when his plane finally landed back in the united states when he was finally released from being held in north korea. when the president says he takes kim jong-un s word for it that he didn t know about otto s condition, do you believe him? it s n not plausible that he didn t know about it. kim describes himself as the supreme leader. otto warmbier was the only american detained at the time this horrible thing happened to him. he was terribly mistreated. what does it do to you hearing that from the president? you know, i ve expressed myself clearly about it saying this guy kim cannot be let off the hook and he can t be trusted. now, it doesn t mean we shouldn t be talking to north korea.