and i know that doesn t mean we shouldn t be worried and concerned and prepare, but i think that we had been seeing the death of roe v. wade. and i think that was very effective, right? it kind of was able to go under the radar in ways. it didn t mobilize people who are pro choice in the way that this is. you look at this and people get it. they want to put doctors in jail for 99 years, more than the time as the rapist. as a legal matter, right now it is 100% unconstitutional and cannot with stand scrutiny. there would have to be a drastic change. that is not really an undue burden. you can impose that.
discovers in the course of his original investigation. if he discovers others, he s going to follow it. the challenge is trump s legacy is one where he made a bunch of shady deals with people of different countries to try to get hisses real estate empire financed. michael, does it make sense russia would use a third party in this way to exert influence? it would if they were to direct the cash through as many front organizations or launder it, if you will, through many organizations. if you have the full force of the united states government s investigatory power, i don t think it will with stand scrutiny. why is that?
release. there s so much that s so strange. they re not going to release the republican memo but not the democrat rebuttal. but the department of justice and the fbi has not had a chance to vet it. so where are we? the justice department very pointedly criticize what had the committee was doing for releasing this classified information, which is at odds with the trump justice department. i think a couple of observations that i have, one, why is it that the administration is launching this assault on the investigation, on the fbi? why do they keep looking like they have so much to hide? why does the president reportedly threaten to fire mueller. he looks like he s hiding something. my first observation is this investigation ought to with stand scrutiny and criticism, that includes mueller and the fbi and the dossier. it ought to be able to with
doing. mayor zimmer s version of our conversation in may of 2013 is not only false, but is illogical and does not with stand scrutiny when all of the facts are examined. any suggestion, any suggestion, that sandy funds were tied to the approval of any project in new jersey is completely false. there is one thing that zimmer and gudawno agree on they had a conversation outside a hoboken grocery store. each oaff them offered a different version of what was said. after that story broke on this show last year federal investigators began looking into zimmer s accusations.
i welcome that. hillary clinton here in new hampshire in 2008. she arrives today to prove she can capture the hearts of new hampshire democrats. she comes here as republicans used her as a punching bag over the weekend. joining me jonathan and patrick covering the 2016 campaign for new york times. patrick, you were writingeing about the republicans all weekend going after hillary clinton. it was something to see one after another trying to find ways on policy or on personal matters to really kind of go after her to paint her as a candidate from the past who s record in recent years on russia benghazi the obama foreign policy generally was something they felt wouldn t with stand scrutiny.