Initiative to address the needs of the highest utilizers of Public Health services. On the fifth of november a broad update. We are concerned about the health and wellbeing of those in San Francisco. We take our role seriously and we will continue to use our meetings as a public forum to discuss important Public Health issues. Members of the public are always invited to attend and provide input. I am mark. Health commission secretary. If you have Public Comment, please hand a slip to me. If you would consider today, there are a lot of people who feel passionately about what you are here for. As others speak, they may have different opinions than you, try to be respectful. Be silent in your show of your opinion by either doing Something Like this or this. If you like what is being said. If you dont like being said do this. Vocalizes is not respectful to the person at the podium. Please consider that. Item 2. Approval of august 20 and september 17 meetings. In front of you is slightly re
Health services. A brief review of the history includes that the facility first opened in 1996 as the Mental Health rehabilitation facility called the merf. It was then a 147 bed psychiatric Skilled Nursing facility. Then in the early 2000s as the environment in San Francisco began to shift toward the need for more lower level residential beds, in 2003 the mayor of San Francisco established a Blue Ribbon Committee for a new design for the services provided. That process resulted in 2004, thmerf moving to a three program mixed use facility consisting of a 47 bed secure and locked Mental Health Rehabilitation Center on the third floor. A 59 bed psychiatric on the second. 41 bed residential facility. In 2005 the adult residential facility was licensed by the state Community Care licensing and began receiving first admissions. That leads us to what we have today, which is again on the third floor a 47 bed merk also called institute for mental disease, locked subacute Mental Health unit. On
Find. Fine. So sorry we put you through this. This is very good conversation for us and as a city, were struggling with this retained element. And well have a lot of projects coming before us. So this is going to help us to get better at it. Thank you. Are we all set . Are we done . Were adjourned. This noting will come to order. I will call the roll. roll call . President james loyce before we get started i would like to read a statement from the commission. Thank you for attending todays meeting. There have been several articles about the property of Public Health adult residence facility. There is frustration and confusion about the past year. In response to the changes made in areas of homelessness and Behavioral Health issues in San Francisco we request the next three meeting including the following relevant items. Today we will discuss the presentation. Next meeting whole Person Care Initiative to address the needs of the highest utilizers of Public Health services. On the fifth
The department did previously with the review back in 1112, the way the department previously did their annual reports where they were much more extensive, but they also took approximately 1824 months to complete. If you look back in history at the departments annual report, technically included data for 1112. It was much longer. So we are looking out for version we are doing now is to find more of a sweet spot in between that has a series of grass and basic data and information and additional narrative and something that is complete within six months of the fiscal year. But doesnt take a major thesis to do. What is the diffidence between what is the difference between a corner and a medical examiner . I am probably not the best one to answer that question. A coroner is under a sheriff, and other jurisdictions in the country. It could be anybody who runs for office and has absolutely no training. The medical Examiner System is set up to bring a level of professionalism to Death Investi
In exclusive space rent over the term of the lease and 889,000 in joint use rent which is determined annually by formula. Im happy to answer questions. Thank you very much. Can we get a report please . Yes, the proposed resolution approves adding El Al Israel Airlines to the agreement at the airport, this is the agreement that all Airlines Sign on to that are operating at the airport, they started operating under permit of may this year. This Lease Agreement sets the terms for rent and for landing fees and as you see in table 2, page 15 of the report, rent over the remaining term of the Lease Agreement through 2021 is 1. 1 million in addition to allow paying landing fees to the airport. There will be the total Lease Agreement for all airlines does expire in 2021 and a new document coming forward to the board. Any members of the public . Seeing none, it is closed. Any questions or comments supervisors . Only to say if my grandma were alive, she would be excited about this item and i wan