and defrauding the united states. the question is, when manafort was meeting with russian intelligence agents or donald trump junior was meeting at trump tower with russian intelligence agents was there something? tucker: we have had the largest investigation in my lifetime of a politician take place and the charges are like you didn t register? that s a bs charge. nobody does. will there be a collusion charge or not? if not, why not apologize to us? i wish people would stop using the world collusion. the question for impeachment at the top of everyone s mind is whether the president conspired with the russian to violate the law. i sit on this network and other
in legal electioneering. the question is, when manafort was meeting with russian intelligence agents or donald trump junior was meeting at trump tower with russian intelligence agents was there something? at this point, we would know. tucker: we have had the largest investigation in my lifetime of a politician take place and the charges are like you didn t register? that s a bs charge. nobody does. or tax evasion will there be a collusion charge it is ludicrous. or not? if not, why not apologize to us? i wish people would stop using the world collusion. it is such an ill-defined word. the question for impeachment at the top of everyone s mind is whether the president conspired with the russian to violate the law. i said on this network and other networks. there is no evidence of that.
testify. maybe you should say that to the senate. the senate is going to have cohen testify as well. you don t have to do it next wednesday. he was the one who delayed it. he was scheduled to have appeared earlier. i would recommend everybody read kim strausle s piece in the wall street journal where she says that as the senate intel committee admitted there was no collusion. the original charge of collusion fell flat. adam schiff, head of the house intel committee, is going to push it to phase two, shifting to phase two of collusion is the way kim strausle puts it, focusing on stuff that is so far removed from what the president did during the campaign or even as president going back to his business dealings before he even announced that he was running for president. they are going to look for all kinds of stuff, because the senate intel committee shot down the collusion charge. we are heading into something else. whether or not the people are
information that we separately know was gained through russian intelligence i think is a significant step forward. it doesn t finally prove the case one way or the other about what the president knew, when he knew it or whether or not he was personally involved in a conspiracy with the russians, but it moves it a step closer to his inner most cirque. do you think there still will be charges against someone on the idea of criminal conspiracy to defraud the government or broadly speaking a collusion charge? that s exactly the point of my hard work on a bipartisan basis to defend the mueller probe. i don t know. none of us knows for sure what robert mueller has uncovered and what he s going to be able to prove. but the president yshouldn t be allowed to interfere with that investigation or short change it. that s why i ve reintroduced a ap bill to protect that probe and allow it to finish. do you j any theories about how many people tied newspaper this investigation, include people
the fringes the whole time. the charge against him is that he lied to the fbi and anyone who knows him as saying this guy probably lies into the mirror in the morning. it started with the fbi counterintelligence investigation of campaign back in 2016. and this is a long removed. i collusion charge was that russian intelligence is interfering in the campaign of 2016. they were interfering in a lot of campaigns around the world. he lied about his attempts to