10 Harsh Realities Of Rewatching The O C 20 Years Later screenrant.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from screenrant.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
when mr. trump worked out this reimbursement arrangement with mr. cohen what other crime was he allegedly trying to cover up? this case brought against any defendant not named donald trump. it s hard to avoid answering no. the other side, in the new york times titled we finally know the case against mr. trump and it s strong. they write in part, not novel or weak about this case the charge of creating false financial records is brought by mr. bragg and other d.a.s in particular, to cover up campaign finance violations that s exactly what mr. trump stands accused of. the judge and jury will make the ultimate determination but they ll be far from the first to
ing after it s over it will come out. with every good defense attorney does don t believe what you see, don t believe the documents and clearly they ll argue that mr. cohen isn t credible the argument for the prosecutor side he s credible because look at the documents. yeah, and multiple witnesses corroborating his testimony. a piece this morning titled what s missing in the trump indictment it writes part, a few surprises perhaps astonishment that mr. bragg s case looks even weaker than expected. here s the big question, where s the second crime recalled that falsifying business records is a misdemeanor in new york, a felony only if the books were cooked with an intent to commit another crime to aid or conceal the commission thereof
and have professional monitoring backing you up with xfinity home. demo in an xfinity store. call, or go online today. one of the notable things about yesterday s seven hours with michael cohen on capitol hill is chris christie pointed out, quote, there hasn t been one republican yet who tried to defend the president on the substance. i think that s something that should be concerning to the white house. cohen isn t a credible witness but he has corroboration on certain things. where is the defense of the president? rick santorum, cnn political commentator, thanks for being with us. why no defense of the president? that was a mistake. taking the approach of
i said some time between now and 2016. he said let me tell you, i could book this guy from now until 2017 and he will never talk to you. i figured, well, cohen isn t going to work so i called core yes lewandowski and had an interview with candidate trump the next week. he could be insulting. dana: this tweet from ben shapiro, he wrote this, cohen s testimony falls into three buckets for trump. one, illegality. embarrassing for trump, super hi layerity. not much in bucket one, a fair amount in bucket three, a p.r. thing. ben as he often is, is right on with the assessment. you look at the illegal issue, michael cohen saying all of these things that don t lien up. the president was working line up. the president was working on this hotel project to bring in hundreds of millions of dollars and be the biggest hotel