Sunshine ordinance not in the bt or state law. It keeps coming up and so attorney can file an action for declaratory relief. Mr. Harts can file a motion to file on this break. Well, the Sunshine Task force can file something. And the Sunshine Task force could. Seems to me that we shouldnt have to deal with the issue. I think theres, as i hear it, theres matter to what mr. Heart is saying. Theres a practical matter so long as you identify it as the subject where that was. It makes some sense. But it seemed like were wasting a lot of time on it and let the Sunshine Task force or the City Attorney get a legal opinion on it. Commissioner im looking at agenda item number 5, page 18 the letter of september 28, 2016 to the Sunshine Ordinance Task force from mrs. Cavillo the clerk of the board, giving a reason why the 150word summary is not included. The clerk can validate whether Public Comment was made like a brief statement in the public section statement the clerk cannot attest to the 150w
Changing the mechanism on what happens. We within the to change it so the sort of agency dealing with each individual contractor including grantees have to require the notice. Wed have to reach out to each individual board and commission and letting them know they are required to do this through the contracting process through rfps and rfqs, we have to do that process, but were changing the mechanism that exists. Contained in that notice provision to the Bidding Company whether its a forprofit or nonprofit, then it would be incumbent on them to notify the boards or investors that theyre subject to the requirement. Correct again, the specifics of how or who receives the notice is not contemplated here and beyond the scope of the ordinance. The agency would be required to notice those persons submitting proposals. Okay. So again just to clarify when we talk about city contracts, were talking about two different kinds of city contracts. Right . One is forprofit contractors architects whoe
Be glad to go through the changm the october draft to the novembt and give a brief explanation one made the change and why its ree to the motion and perhaps that d help jump start the discussion. Chair keane does that help commissioner kopp . Yes. First change that we made wao section 1. 126 which is the ban n contribution from caters to off contractors to official officiae the contract to the city. We strengthen the notification n located in section 1. 126f in te ordinance, the concern raised be commission is persons subject tn may not know they are and unwity violate it. So they want to help ensure thal persons subject to this rule knt they are. Generally speaking, the way thid work is that the City Department issues a request for bids wouldo notify potential bidders that te rules that they would be subjecf they submit a bid to the city be 1. 26 applies to bidders not juss with a contract already. That would give the entity or pn notice that these rules exist. Then once the City Depa
Requirement. Chair keane just to add a couple of things to what you said, those friday meetings in the first quarter, the one on january 12th and february 89th would be at 10 00 in the morning. Thats correct. Chair keane and on friday march 16th that would be at 1 00 p. M. Correct. Chair keane all the rest after that a tuesdays at 10 00 a. M. Those would be special meetings and adopted if you took this approach. The bylaw change would refer to a second tuesday meeting that would be as a regular matter a second tuesday at 10 00 going forward. We presume the dates for that would be available into 2019 if the commission were wr to take this approach. Approach. Chair keane commissioners, your thoughts. Im for it. Chair keane commissioner p kopp is for it. Commissioner lee. Thank you mr. Chair and i want to thank the staff for the diligent work in putting the full schedules together. I was one of the commissioners who asked the staff to look into possibly finding other meeting times for fut
Its defined getting page nur you. That is page 29 of agenda item. The payment that is made at thet of an officer or agent thereof s made principally for a legislatr government or charitable nature. We did create what i think is an important exception. You can see on the next page, ts for public appeal. Public appeal is a request for t when such request is made by mef television, radio, billboard. The distribution of 500 or more identical pieces of printed matr a speech to 500 or more individ. There is an exception in this rg system where if an official maka request, via public appeal, then disloashedisclosurethendisclosu. This came up and we tried to crs exception so the appeal would ne caught up in this because its e kind of conduct that staff belie commission was looking at when s looking at 3. 2784 when it instrs to create a disclosure testimon. Indeed we publicly said thate time. Right. So this is an idea contained in, i wanted to highlight that to st idea has been carried over and